On 14/10/2010 19:10, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> Shouldn't we change io_write() too?
> Yes, they are exact parallels.
Here is a patch that should make io_read() and io_write() return ESPIPE
when called with offset != -1 for non-seekable objects. I've tested all
the components affected by this pat
Hi,
Alle domenica 31 ottobre 2010, Manuel Menal ha scritto:
> The Hurd port of the GNU C Library defines an error code macro called
> `ED', which the glibc manual describes as "The experienced user will
> know what is wrong.". This error code macro doesn't seem to be used
> anywhere.
To be precis
If ED is a problem, then it should just be removed. It's only there as a
joke. That said, my recollection is that POSIX does reserve all E[A-Z0-9]+
macro names to the implementation for uses. But I don't really
recall if that's so.
Hello,
The Hurd port of the GNU C Library defines an error code macro called
`ED', which the glibc manual describes as "The experienced user will
know what is wrong.". This error code macro doesn't seem to be used
anywhere.
Although having a reserved, generic error code macro might be useful(?),