Re: unsubscribe

Hi, On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:20:04PM -0500, Quiliro Ordóñez wrote: > Please help me get unsubscripted because I did it yesterday at: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/ > and I still receive mails. When I try to get unsubscripted again, it sends > me an email saying I am already unsubscripted

Re: unsubscribe

Thank you very much Samuel and Jeremie. Sorry about the slip. -- Saludos/Greetings Quiliro Ordóñez 593(2)340 1517 / 593(9)821 8696 Even The Troops Are Waking Up ACTA – Un acuerdo que puede garantizar la crucificción de internet GNU

Re: open_issues/bash_busy-loop.mdwn

olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Wed 18 Aug 2010 14:38:34 +0200, a écrit : > Yes for both. I generated a backtrace from the hang with dash: > >#0 0x0104ef1c in swtch_pri () at > /usr/src/eglibc-2.11.2/build-tree/hurd-i386-libc/mach/swtch_pri.S:2 >#1 0x010507b4 in __spin_lock_solid (lock=0x11

unsubscribe

I want to unsubscribe from this list even though I support that Hurd becomes the default kernel for GNU for reasons of freedom. Nevertheless, this list is too technical for me. I do not know how to support Hurd with my limited technical capacity. I know how to complie but Hurd is too technical for

Re: open_issues/bash_busy-loop.mdwn

Hi, On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 03:45:55PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > I'll check whether a NOP loop also causes a hang. And whether it > happens with another shell. Yes for both. I generated a backtrace from the hang with dash: #0 0x0104ef1c in swtch_pri () at /usr/src/eglibc-2.11

Re: sleep in microsecond or nanosecond

Hi, On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:07:02PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Fri 13 Aug 2010 08:42:33 +0200, a écrit : > > I think improving the timeout granularity in general would be rather > > complicated, and make little sense... > > Improving the timeout granularity fo

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Fix /proc/*/cmdline.

Hi Samuel, thanks for the review. On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 01:22:03AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Jeremie Koenig, le Fri 13 Aug 2010 19:05:12 +0200, a écrit : > > On Linux, /proc//cmdline is a NUL-separated list of arguments. > > We used to truncate after the first one and add some whitespa

Re: [PATCH 4/5] Implement /proc/cmdline as a symlinks to 2/cmdline

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 01:34:49AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Jeremie Koenig, le Mon 16 Aug 2010 13:36:51 +0200, a écrit : > > This is not perfect, as the format of > > /proc/cmdline and /proc/*/cmdline are different on Linux. Namely, the > > latter includes NUL bytes to separate subsequent ar

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Bring console-driver-xkb up to date

Michael Banck, le Wed 18 Aug 2010 10:52:42 +0200, a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 03:03:19AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Diego Nieto Cid, le Wed 04 Aug 2010 04:19:58 -0300, a écrit : > > >The past couple of weeks I've been packaging Marco's input driver > > > for Arch Hurd and I've fo

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Bring console-driver-xkb up to date

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 03:03:19AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Diego Nieto Cid, le Wed 04 Aug 2010 04:19:58 -0300, a écrit : > >The past couple of weeks I've been packaging Marco's input driver > > for Arch Hurd and I've found that some changes were necesary to make > > it work

Re: [PATCH 2/7] Fix the way FOOFLAGS is handled

Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 18 Aug 2010 05:53:52 +0200, a écrit : > Will take care of this. Thanks! > But, as usually, there'll be some delay involved: No problem: as I understand it, these are just improvements which are not strictly needed for d-i. > we're just about to start our city's ten-day `