Hello!
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 02:06:21PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > * What's the reason for having a libmachuser / libhurduser be part of
> >glibc?
> Given the need for the libraries, they have to be built somewhere.
Obviously. :-)
> you still need the function to exist, so
At Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:16:03 +0200,
Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> * Avoid code duplication -- may have been relevant, but is it
> still?
>
> Actually, if I understood correctly, in his Viengoos kernel, Neal
> is doing all RPC stub code generation in the pre-processor, thus
> * What's the reason for having a libmachuser / libhurduser be part of
>glibc?
>
>Is it for Roland's convenience, or is there a technical reason? Can
>we move it out of the glibc build process?
>
Given the need for the libraries, they have to be built somewhere. Since
glibc needs t
Hello!
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:17:32AM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> El Sun, 18 Jul 2010 00:47:01 +0300
> Karim Allah Ahmed escribió:
>
> > I've modified a little bit some RPCs of the current gnumach interface
> > ( mainly added a new argument ) , all the changes are in
> > ( [gnu-src]/includ
Hello!
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:19:21PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] Bump HURD_INTERFACE_VERSION
>
> * hurd/version.h (HURD_INTERFACE_VERSION): Bumped for the
> recently added RPCs.
I don't see a need for doing this unless you conditionalize anything on
t
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 02:07:19PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 12:21:16 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > And here goes the glibc one.
>
> > diff --git a/hurd/hurd.h b/hurd/hurd.h
> > index 642ea43..a83c3fa 100644
> > --- a/hurd/hurd.h
> > +++ b/hurd/hurd.h
> >
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:19:21PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >From 03b291be17be4beb67d7397526c1ae7c292649df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:37:20 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Bump HURD_INTERFACE_VERSION
>
> * hurd/version.h (HURD_
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:21:16PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> And here goes the glibc one.
>
> Regards,
> Emilio
>
> 2010-07-16 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> * hurd/hurdexec.c (_hurd_exec): Deprecate it.
> (_hurd_exec_file_name): New function.
> * hurd/hurd.h: Declare
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:17:38PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Note that this patch should only be applied after the glibc patch is applied,
> and maybe some time later (perhaps after a stable release shipping it?).
I think the commit order will need to be brought up at today's meeting.
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:15:06PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >From 3804a36fcf95a3fd588ce67a08a36346134b8d1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 01:27:40 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Add a file_exec_file_name RPC
>
> * hurd/fs.defs (f
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:13:56PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 31/05/10 18:27, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > I have reviewed the patches and apart from formatting there were only
> > a couple of issues. Next iteration is hopefully the last.
>
> I hope so!
Almost. :-)
The bi
El Sun, 18 Jul 2010 00:47:01 +0300
Karim Allah Ahmed escribió:
> I've modified a little bit some RPCs of the current gnumach interface
> ( mainly added a new argument ) , all the changes are in
> ( [gnu-src]/include/mach/mach.defs ) , and I've
> modified the pager library accordingly.
>
> Now I
12 matches
Mail list logo
