Re: Continuous Hurd cross-builds on Hydra

Hi, writes: > Well, in X.Org the person running the tinderbox is also the one checking > the results; and he sends mails to the developer list whenever the > results indicate that a new commit broke something. I may report problems occasionally but I essentially view it as a service for Hurd ha

Re: Continuous Hurd cross-builds on Hydra

Hi, On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:10:20PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > writes: > >> Hydra can send email notifications when the status of a build > >> changes (e.g., from ???succeeded??? to ???failed???.) I can add > >> whoever feels like receiving Hydra news. > > > > Well, if it doesn't genera

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

Hi, On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:29:06PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 26/05/10 09:32, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > IIRC my major concern with this approach was that this way, the > > original task has to guess what file name will be valid in the new > > task's context... I don't

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

Hi, On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 04:45:12PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > > On 26/05/10 09:32, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > > IIRC my major concern with this approach was that this way, the > > > original task has to guess what file name will be valid in the new > > > task's context... I d