El Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:06:18 +0200
Samuel Thibault escribió:
> Sergio Lopez, le Tue 20 Apr 2010 13:08:32 +0200, a écrit :
> > I think you're in the right direction, but we need a broader
> > approach. Separating external pages (from externally managed memory
> > objects) from anonymous pages in a
Sergio Lopez, le Tue 20 Apr 2010 13:08:32 +0200, a écrit :
> I think you're in the right direction, but we need a broader approach.
> Separating external pages (from externally managed memory objects) from
> anonymous pages in a different pair of active/inactive queues could be
> a nice start.
An
El Sun, 18 Apr 2010 23:28:52 +0600
Волков Максим escribió:
> I noticed that the paging starts only when the number in the free
> queue of pages is less than vm_page_free_min and continues until it
> reaches free_target. Variable vm_page_free_target is set via macro
> VM_PAGE_FREE_TARGET.
>
> #i
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 03:45:05PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 04:27:28AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > Presently we don't have any mechanisms for server-side per-process
> > handling though. (Again, beyond chroot.) While at some point we
> > mentio
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 03:35:49PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> Again, it seems like a natural split to me. One translator per
> filesystem: one to merge the different packages into a single
> filesystem, and the other to interact with it.
I really don't see any point in introducing
