Re: Many questions about translators

2010-04-19 Thread Carl Fredrik Hammar
Hello, On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 04:27:28AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > Nah, I think you are right. Systems that provide private namespaces > (beyond chroot) -- which most notably includes Plan9, but also Linux > nowadays -- do so per-process rather than per-user. So a user gets a > p

Re: Many questions about translators

2010-04-19 Thread Carl Fredrik Hammar
Hello, On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 04:17:17AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:52:04AM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > > > Yes, a translator can attach itself to multiple nodes, but if a > > translator takes an active role in attaching itself it cannot be set >

Re: Many questions about translators

2010-04-19 Thread Carl Fredrik Hammar
Hi, On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 10:54:37AM +0200, Patrik Olsson wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 11:52 +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:47:49PM +0200, Patrik Olsson wrote: > > > 3. Is it possible to have one translator working on two nodes at > > > the same t

Re: Building software for the Hurd

2010-04-19 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
Hello, On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:32:43PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 09:58:12AM +0200, Patrik Olsson wrote: > > > I mean I'm not able to (or have time to) fix any problems that may > > arise if I use GNU/Hurd as a work station. It would just add another > > la