glibc CPUCLOCK_WHICH missing error for i686-pc-gnu

Hi, I have a cross-compiler working for i586-pc-gnu, but when I try changing to i686-pc-gnu (with -march= also changing from i586 to i686) I get this error during the first pass of glibc: /home/allan/hurd/build/glibc-build/rt/librt_pic.a(clock_settime.os): In function `clock_settime': clock

Re: man: pipeline, additional questions

Hello, Jakub Daniel, le Tue 08 Dec 2009 22:27:12 +0100, a écrit : > when i tried to examine man page of dpkg i got the following error (not right > away but after i scrolled to line 129 or similar): > > man: pipeline.c:1671: pipeline_peek_skop: Assertion `len <= p->peek_offset' > failed. Thanks

Re: tmpfs

olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Mon 11 Jan 2010 15:14:57 +0100, a écrit : > But it misses this, which I just found by mere coincidence: > >http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?26751 Ah, right, it was actually in my looong pipeline of mails to process someday. As I explained there, the fix is far from p

[bug #26751] creating memory objects through the proxy defpager can fail

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #26751 (project hurd): Mmm, indeed, there's an issue: MACH_MSG_TYPE_MAKE_SEND means the msg sender has a receive right, and makes a send right out of it, but here the defpager proxy, by calling default_pager_object_create, only gets a send right, so can't use MACH_MSG_TY

Re: tmpfs

Hi, On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 01:40:55PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Ah, nice :-) But it misses this, which I just found by mere coincidence: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?26751 -antrik-

Re: tmpfs

Hi, On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 04:10:53AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > I've tried to use tmpfs for a /dev directory (10M size), and it seems > to be not so stable: symlinks don't seem to be working for instance, > and I couldn't create a file with some content. Yes, it's known to be broken. > H

Re: tmpfs

Hello! On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 04:10:53AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > I've tried to use tmpfs for a /dev directory (10M size), and it seems to > be not so stable: symlinks don't seem to be working for instance, and I > couldn't create a file with some content. Has somebody looked at such > fa

Re: tmpfs

Hi, On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 04:10:53AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > I've tried to use tmpfs for a /dev directory (10M size), and it seems to > be not so stable: symlinks don't seem to be working for instance, and I > couldn't create a file with some content. Has somebody looked at such > fai

Off Topic: Re: xz

Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2010 18:54:33 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net: > Just drop lzma-utils -- xz is the successor of lzma, and xz-utils > provide the lzma tools for compatibility. I had to fix the packages which still depended on lzma instad of xz :( Or at least that was the case a few weeks ag