Re: procfs

Hi, --- On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Anand Rathi wrote: | how to use procfs ? \-- After building procfs code (make in src/) Try: # mkdir /proc # settrans -fgap /proc procfs You can then use ls, cat on /proc. SK -- Shakthi Kannan http://www.shakthimaan.com

procfs

how to use procfs ?

[bug #28446] No checks are made for unteminated strings in RPC messages

URL: Summary: No checks are made for unteminated strings in RPC messages Project: The GNU Hurd Submitted by: hammy Submitted on: Wed 30 Dec 2009 08:42:20 PM CET Category: None

Re: Reauthentication implementation flaw due to EINTR

Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Wed 30 Dec 2009 16:38:35 +0100, a écrit : > On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 02:01:12PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Wed 30 Dec 2009 12:40:02 +0100, a écrit : > > > > > > The notification has been requested by > > > auth_server_authenticate which is waiti

[PATCH] Assert the device name before storing it.

* eth-multiplexer/vdev.c (add_vdev): Assert the name of the device to be created before copying it into the vdev structure. --- Hello, On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 06:03:46PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:25:47PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > Still, I

Re: Reauthentication implementation flaw due to EINTR

On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 02:01:12PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Wed 30 Dec 2009 12:40:02 +0100, a écrit : > > > > The notification has been requested by > > auth_server_authenticate which is waiting for auth_user_authenticate > > to arive. > > Only when the user isn't ar

Re: [PATCH] Handle the root node of eth-multiplexer correctly.

Hello, On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 10:49:39PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > >From 9408aa4f1896a89d9d354d7a0e0f75cbf0d2fc0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Sergiu Ivanov > > Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:09:21 +0300 > > Subject: [PATCH] Handle the root node of eth-multiplexer correctly. > >

Re: [PATCH] Devnode: Fix the pseudo-master device port opening flags.

Hello, On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 06:57:30PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 04:26:55PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > However, taking into consideration the fact that antrik answers > > E-mails pretty fast these days, > > Only those that I can answer really quick

Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer

Hello, On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 06:14:10PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 06:32:41PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:51:16PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > > wrote: > > > > These are probably all related. It's all part of the network >

Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer

Hello, On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 06:12:14PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 09:01:50PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > As I said on the IRC, I planned to send you the repository by E-mail, > > but the size of the (archived) version is 20MB, which is bad. > > Did y

Re: Reauthentication implementation flaw due to EINTR

Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Wed 30 Dec 2009 13:08:38 +0100, a écrit : > But how do you replace the auth server? Do you install a modified one > and just reboot? Yes. > Seems kinda risky. For just additional prints it's not. I'm running it in a virtual machine so I can easily replace with the origi

Re: Reauthentication implementation flaw due to EINTR

Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Wed 30 Dec 2009 12:40:02 +0100, a écrit : > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:46:09PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Tue 29 Dec 2009 23:40:21 +0100, a écrit : > > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:10:00PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > > > > > That's t

Re: Reauthentication implementation flaw due to EINTR

On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:34:08PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Tue 29 Dec 2009 23:29:35 +0100, a écrit : > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:55:41PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Tue 29 Dec 2009 22:48:26 +0100, a écrit : > > > > It's still a myst

Re: Reauthentication implementation flaw due to EINTR

On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:46:09PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Tue 29 Dec 2009 23:40:21 +0100, a écrit : > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:10:00PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > > > That's the same. To make it clearer, see attached patch. > > > > I meant in the ot