Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Tue 29 Dec 2009 23:40:21 +0100, a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:10:00PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >
> > That's the same. To make it clearer, see attached patch.
>
> I meant in the other branch of the if (though for some reason I didn't
> consider the server p
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:10:00PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> That's the same. To make it clearer, see attached patch.
I meant in the other branch of the if (though for some reason I didn't
consider the server part's if). Patch attatched for clarity.
Regards,
Fredrik
diff --git a/auth
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 29 Dec 2009 23:34:08 +0100, a écrit :
> > OK, I can use that for the client side. I don't really have a setup
> > for testing the auth server though. Do you use a sub-Hurd or something?
>
> I've never managed to find time to set up a sub-hurd, so I just debug
> with write
Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Tue 29 Dec 2009 23:29:35 +0100, a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:55:41PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Tue 29 Dec 2009 22:48:26 +0100, a écrit :
> > > It's still a mystery to me why ext2fs gets an EINTR without auth
> > > explicitly returnin
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:55:41PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Tue 29 Dec 2009 22:48:26 +0100, a écrit :
> > It's still a mystery to me why ext2fs gets an EINTR without auth
> > explicitly returning EINTR...
>
> AIUI, the RPC gets aborted and ext2fs receives MACH_RCV_PO
Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Tue 29 Dec 2009 23:01:06 +0100, a écrit :
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 03:24:52AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Sun 27 Dec 2009 20:56:21 +0100, a écrit :
> > > If the notification request is canceled before auth_user_authenticate
> > > returns there
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 03:24:52AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Sun 27 Dec 2009 20:56:21 +0100, a écrit :
> > If the notification request is canceled before auth_user_authenticate
> > returns there should be no problem.
>
> I tried a crude
>
> error_t err2 = m
Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Tue 29 Dec 2009 22:48:26 +0100, a écrit :
> It's still a mystery to me why ext2fs gets an EINTR without auth
> explicitly returning EINTR...
AIUI, the RPC gets aborted and ext2fs receives MACH_RCV_PORT_DIED, which
_hurd_intr_rpc_mach_msg turns into EINTR.
BTW, reproducing
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 03:43:47AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Sun 27 Dec 2009 22:24:24 +0100, a écrit :
> > OK, I think I have a vague picture of what is going on:
> > ports_interrupt_self_on_port_death
> > ports_interrupt_self_on_notification
> > ports_interrupt_r
Hi,
--- On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 4:13 AM, wrote:
| I guess the hurd/ prefix is not necessary when building in-tree. As I
| already said on IRC, the file was never meant to be compiled standalone.
\--
Ok.
---
| But perhaps it still works with the Prefix even in-tree... Could you
| test that?
\--
On 09-12-29 下午5:42, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:45:50PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
>
>> I tried to boot subhurd but no matter how I try it, it just fails to
>> boot.
>
>> #boot servers.boot /dev/hd1
>
> Err... /dev/hd1? That's almost certainly wrong. You want
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:45:50PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> I tried to boot subhurd but no matter how I try it, it just fails to
> boot.
> #boot servers.boot /dev/hd1
Err... /dev/hd1? That's almost certainly wrong. You want to boot from a
partition, not from a drive...
(I guess some kind o
12 matches
Mail list logo
