Hi,
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It is with great pleasure that I announce that now that the multiboot
> patch got commited in Xen's unstable tree for the coming 4.0 release,
> I have merged GNU Mach's Xen tree into master, i.e. although it has
> already been used for the Debian buildds fo
Hello,
It is with great pleasure that I announce that now that the multiboot
patch got commited in Xen's unstable tree for the coming 4.0 release,
I have merged GNU Mach's Xen tree into master, i.e. although it has
already been used for the Debian buildds for a couple of years already,
GNU Mach n
Da Zheng, le Tue 15 Dec 2009 23:16:11 +0800, a écrit :
> > That could be a glitch of some other mechanism. You can use disassemble
> > 0x01060089 to check what's really there and l * 0x01060089 to check
> > which precise file that comes from.
> disassemble is really useful:-) I really need to lear
Hi,
Thank you for your previous mail.
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Da Zheng, le Tue 15 Dec 2009 13:51:09 +0800, a écrit :
>> (gdb) run
>> Starting program: /root/hurd/ddekit_test/test
>> test1 thread starts at 1260701688
>> test1 thread wakes up at 1260701691
>> test1 thread enter
Hello again,
Da Zheng, le Tue 15 Dec 2009 13:51:09 +0800, a écrit :
> (gdb) run
> Starting program: /root/hurd/ddekit_test/test
> test1 thread starts at 1260701688
> test1 thread wakes up at 1260701691
> test1 thread enter a semaphore at 1260701691, timeout: 1
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV
When you look in glibc, always look in the build tree as well, you'll
see evc_wait.S which is automatically built, calling the kernel_trap
macro.
Samuel
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:42:49PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> * netfs.c (netfs_append_args) : Change the format
> specification to ``%d''.
Look right, please push to the master branch.
Would have been nice though to mention what this patch is for... :-)
-antrik-
