Hello,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:21:01AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 07:20:08PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > antrik suggested that I put only the patch series to which he has
> > given a final acknowledge into the public repository.
>
> Not exactly: I su
Hi,
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:52:16AM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
>
>> However, the problem is that the code of the driver was checked in to
>> my Hurd git repository and there are many irrelevant commits in the
>> history of the branch for developing the use
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:52:16AM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> However, the problem is that the code of the driver was checked in to
> my Hurd git repository and there are many irrelevant commits in the
> history of the branch for developing the user-level driver because I
> created the branch f
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 07:20:08PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> antrik suggested that I put only the patch series to which he has
> given a final acknowledge into the public repository.
Not exactly: I suggested that you only put the acknowledged patches on
the *main* unionmount branch. Ther
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:57:06AM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> Experiment 1: sending 100MB data from the host machine to the Hurd
> with TCP. I only calculate data transferring rate (i.e., excluding the
> size of packet headers).
> in-kernel user-level averag
Da Zheng, le Fri 11 Dec 2009 17:02:37 +0800, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >
> >> i was not able to find much information about this
> >
> > We haven't had any GNU Mach bug for a long time, while we do know quite
> > a few bugs in the Hurd itself, so for sure it's not the part that is
> >
Hi,
Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
>> i was not able to find much information about this
>
> We haven't had any GNU Mach bug for a long time, while we do know quite
> a few bugs in the Hurd itself, so for sure it's not the part that is
> hindering GNU/Hurd :)
I have experienced GNUMach crash when I wo
