Re: My absence at the tomorrow's (Oct 7) meeting

On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 11:00:41PM +0100, Davi Leal wrote: > Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > > > Things may turn out differently and I may still arrive at the Hurd > > > meeting (being late), but I won't say this is much probable. > > > > Oh, that reminds me. I will probably also be an hour or so lat

Re: clisp -- Flávio Cruz, GSoC 2008 (was: Writing translators in lisp - cl-hurd code recovered)

Am Dienstag, 6. Oktober 2009 11:08:24 schrieb Thomas Schwinge: > In the longer term, do we intend to keep all these repositories in sync > (Savannah, gitorious: Git; bitbucket: hg), or do we retire all but one of > them? Pros / cons? I would definitely retire gitorious (since it doesn't add anyth

Re: nsmux Documentation

Am Sonntag, 4. Oktober 2009 20:36:16 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov: > Thank you for the idea! :-) I will add such examples, but only after I > have fixed the ugly bugs concerning the behaviour of nsmux run as > normal user. These bugs are top priority now, because it is my > enormous blunder to have teste

fdopendir on non-directory

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Another bug detected by gnulib: fdopendir(creat("file",0600)) returns a DIR* pointer rather than NULL; subsequent attempts to use that pointer with readdir() then fail with ENOTDIR. But POSIX requires that the fdopendir fail with ENOTDIR up front. -

Re: fdopendir on non-directory

fdopendir uses __file_name_lookup_under (port, "/", O_DIRECTORY | O_NOTRANS, 0) which I think is exactly right. Something has gotten broken lower down if that is not doing it. Thanks, Roland

Re: rename() making ext2fs going bonkers?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Samuel Thibault on 10/6/2009 6:12 PM: > rename("dir2", "dir/."); > > with dir/ existing, which is hanging > > The obvious issue is that rename_dir is passed "." as toname and not the > actual directory name, but since that's what the RPC

Re: rename() making ext2fs going bonkers? (was: interested in an account)

Hello, Thomas Schwinge, le Sat 03 Oct 2009 12:31:22 +0200, a écrit : > Hello! > > On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 10:01:22AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > > However, I'm wondering if I just tickled a bug that hung flubber; > > I was running the gnulib test for rename(2), and lost all response from > > the m

Re: bash vs. screen vs. SIGINT

Thomas Schwinge, le Tue 06 Oct 2009 23:43:37 +0200, a écrit : > On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 06:06:35PM +0200, I wrote: > > There are issues with the bash 4.0 packages, and new Debian screen > > packages w.r.t. handling of SIGINT. I don't think that glibc is at > > fault, but instead bash and screen sh

Re: bash vs. screen vs. SIGINT

Hurd controlling tty behavior is generally consistent with BSD's, including TIOCSCTTY. Linux also has TIOCSCTTY and it is harmless to use it there. But BSD and Hurd never do an implicit TIOCSCTTY (hence our O_NOCTTY is zero). Thanks, Roland

Re: My absence at the tomorrow's (Oct 7) meeting

Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > > Things may turn out differently and I may still arrive at the Hurd > > meeting (being late), but I won't say this is much probable. > > Oh, that reminds me. I will probably also be an hour or so late for > the meeting. Why not just delay the Hurd meeting 1 hour, or

Re: bash vs. screen vs. SIGINT

Hello! On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 06:06:35PM +0200, I wrote: > There are issues with the bash 4.0 packages, and new Debian screen > packages w.r.t. handling of SIGINT. I don't think that glibc is at > fault, but instead bash and screen should be looked at. Details are at >

viengoos build

Hi, I am getting a make error when doing 'make check': l4_uint64_t is undefined. ? anyone know of this and what to do to resolve?

Re: My absence at the tomorrow's (Oct 7) meeting

Hi, On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:17:02PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > I'm afraid I won't be able to arrive at the Hurd meeting, because > there will be a meeting regarding scholarships in leading European > universities tomorrow, and I have a dream to manage to get into one of > such universities.

My absence at the tomorrow's (Oct 7) meeting

Hello, I'm afraid I won't be able to arrive at the Hurd meeting, because there will be a meeting regarding scholarships in leading European universities tomorrow, and I have a dream to manage to get into one of such universities. Things may turn out differently and I may still arrive at the Hurd

Re: nsmux -- Sergiu Ivanov, GSoC 2008

Hello, On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 11:50:13AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 05:39:34PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:20:01PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:56:01PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > > Please note tha

Re: ssh between host, and qemu GNU Hurd

2009/10/6 Shakthi Kannan : > Hi, > > Thanks to "anatoly", "aiss" on #hurd... Anatoly is my real name, so there's no need in quotes :-)

libchannel -- Carl Fredrik Hammar, GSoC 2007 (was: Moving to git)

Hello! On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:07:09AM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 03:02:41PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > Also, I'll add branches for the former GSoC projects -- are there any > > former GSoC people (CCed) who already have done their work somewhere > > else

nsmux -- Sergiu Ivanov, GSoC 2008 (was: Moving to git)

Hello! On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 05:39:34PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:20:01PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:56:01PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > Please note that most of my commits to nsmux repository are ugly. Is > > > that okay?..

clisp -- Flávio Cruz, GSoC 2008 (was: Writing translators in lisp - cl-hurd code recovered)

Hello! On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 08:23:22AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Dienstag, 15. September 2009 08:56:24 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide: > > Since the Hurd has bindings for using common Lisp for translators, you can > > in fact use Lisp to write part of an OS (the attached snapshot