On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 3:22 AM, wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:42:41PM +0200, Gianluca Guida wrote:
>
>> At the time, I was actually in favor of a separate stowfs which were
>> just using common code for unionfs, but politics and other rather
>> meaningless reasons brought it into the way it
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 03:37:23AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:07:18AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:42:41PM +0200, Gianluca Guida wrote:
>
> > > I do agree that it's counter-intuitive. Please note that the stow
> > > func
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:37 AM, wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 01:07:27AM +0200, Gianluca Guida wrote:
>> > This is a non-trivial problem. Other unionfs implementations
>> > probably spent considerable time figuring out how to do it best. I
>> > entreated Gianluca to check what over implementat
Hi Gianluca,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 01:07:27AM +0200, Gianluca Guida wrote:
> Hm, funny things happens while grepping past mail.
Hehe... Nice to see you here :-)
> > This is a non-trivial problem. Other unionfs implementations
> > probably spent considerable time figuring out how to do it best
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:42:41PM +0200, Gianluca Guida wrote:
> At the time, I was actually in favor of a separate stowfs which were
> just using common code for unionfs, but politics and other rather
> meaningless reasons brought it into the way it is now.
Really? That's interesting -- I
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:07:18AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:42:41PM +0200, Gianluca Guida wrote:
> > I do agree that it's counter-intuitive. Please note that the stow
> > functionality was mostly meant for the GNU system as a base for a --
> > rather complex I'
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:38:26PM +0200, Gianluca Guida wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Sergiu
> Ivanov wrote:
> > I wonder whether there is still the necessity to keep things as they
> > are. I can see that the files in which you are mentioned as the
> > author date back to 2005
