sir i want fresh dumps that's why i m doing register in u r site, i don't know
how is possib...
pls sand me detail, how can i do it.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Sergiu
Ivanov wrote:
> I see... It has never occurred to me that unionfs could be used in a
> packaging system :-)
There are things you don't really want to know about the Hurd. :-)
> I wonder whether there is still the necessity to keep things as they
> are. I
Hi Sergiu,
I do agree that it's counter-intuitive. Please note that the stow
functionality was mostly meant for the GNU system as a base for a --
rather complex I'd say -- packaging system.
The idea was that the first level after the stow directory was the
package, and we were matching against pa
Hello,
Thank you for the swift response!
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:42:41PM +0200, Gianluca Guida wrote:
> I do agree that it's counter-intuitive. Please note that the stow
> functionality was mostly meant for the GNU system as a base for a --
> rather complex I'd say -- packaging system.
>
> Th
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:00:10AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 05:08:28AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 09:23:23AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> Sergiu, then please remove the shadowfs reference(s) from the GNU
> Hurd Refere
Hello,
Recently I have been browsing the code implementing the stowing
feature in unionfs it struck me that I cannot figure out the reason
for it to be implemented in the way it is.
Normally the stowing feature works as follows: one starts unionfs in
the following way:
$ settrans -a unionfs --
---
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 05:08:28AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 09:23:23AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > I'm sending in my attempt to compile a unionfs documentation. It is
> > formatted as a stand-alone Texinfo file for now, so that I am able to
