Am Freitag, 17. Juli 2009 00:44:20 schrieb Da Zheng:
> It works. I have got a copy:-)
> I wonder where I can upload it to?
Did they explicitely allow you to upload it?
Sometimes people/organizations enforce the rule that papers must not be
published privately, and they might not like the paper
Hi,
I have thought about this on and off for a while, but my conclusions
haven't changed.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 09:59:18AM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:21:09PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > I thought I already said this at some point, but maybe I
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:21:20PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 03:23:29AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 07:17:33PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 06:52:37AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> > > wrote:
>
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:23:34AM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:05:26AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 07:07:35PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > > Another interesting possibility would be to let the code modules
> >
Hi,
As I already said on IRC, I do see some merit in the idea of reverse
authentication, i.e. file objects authenticating against clients. It
makes sense to consider files as active objects, which have access to
certain user IDs. (The fact that a file system usually provides a whole
bunch of indiv
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 09:23:23AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> I'm sending in my attempt to compile a unionfs documentation. It is
> formatted as a stand-alone Texinfo file for now, so that I am able to
> build and view .info files from it.
I don't understand -- why can't you just build it
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 03:32:09PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> The first one I have considered is the ability to load different but
> compatible versions of the module. For instance, so that one can load
> a module with debugging symbols when debugging.
[...]
> Though this is mostly
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:27:02PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> + /* Add the --mount option to the result. */
> + if (mountee_argz)
> +{
> + /* The string describing the value of the ``--mount'' option. */
> + char * opt = NULL;
The comment is confusing: this does not desc
Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Confirmed. Neither is it (it's part of the ``Proceedings of the USENIX
Mach III Symposium'', by the way) available at my university's library or
another library nearby.
Options:
* Thomas, Roland (CCed): Do you have a copy somewhere?
* Send email to the authors, aski
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 07:10:07PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:17:23AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > > > > + /*Opens the port on which to set the new translator */
> > > > > + error_t
> > > > > +open_port
> > > > > +(int flags, mach_p
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:17:23AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 07:10:48PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 08:07:01PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
>
> > > > + /*This is actually the end of initialization, so if somet
>From 3e115d794301c7c8966c077e1e7da40752821574 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sergiu Ivanov
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 23:08:44 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Start the mountee in a lazy fashion.
* mount.c (unionmount_proxy): New variable.
(mountee_port): Likewise.
(mountee_started): Likewise.
(setup_unionmou
12 matches
Mail list logo
