RE: NX support in GNU Mach

Other things I have found in my experience with Debian GNU/Hurd is that aptitude and man-db is still broken. I am using apt-get for now, but it doesn't have the TUI that aptitude have. > Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:36:59 -0400 > From: samuel.thiba...@gnu.or

Re: News...

Am Montag, 13. Juli 2009 12:07:46 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net: > > and the patches are not yet in the upstream sources. > > Nor are they likely to be next month, or the one after... > > The news will look very sad if we go by upstream inclusion. Since upstream-inclusion might take an undefined

Re: Unionmount: proxying the control port

Hello, On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:24:32PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 08:17:10PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 02:40:49AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > > wrote: > > > > > Is this really a problem? The question is whether nfsd can dea

Re: NX support in GNU Mach

Yuhong Bao, le Mon 13 Jul 2009 11:46:09 -0700, a écrit : > > Other things I have found in my experience with Debian GNU/Hurd is that > aptitude and man-db is still broken. > I am using apt-get for now, but it doesn't have the TUI that aptitude have. Feel free to help on these. Samuel

How to request notifications

Hello, My current goal is to make unionmount go away when the mountee (the union-mounted translator) goes away. From antrik's words (and from personal remembering) I know that this could be achieved by listening to the MACH_NOTIFY_NO_SENDERS notification on translator's control port. However, I

Re: [PATCH] Enable the mountee to be started after initialization.

>From 190cae3ebd013ac5e168fae9b9f50456e3d4679a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergiu Ivanov Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 23:49:14 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Enable the mountee to be started after initialization. * main.c (main): Schedule an update to start the mountee. * mount.c (setup_unionmount): Don't fo

Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add the mountee to the list of merged filesystems.

Hello, On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:02:50PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 08:22:51PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:20:35AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > > wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 06:53:50PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: >

Re: News...

Hi, On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 12:30:59PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 05:17:27AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 07:10:15PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > I really don't like the idea of postponing the news till the next > > month. T

Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add the code for adding the mountee to the merged filesystems

Hi, On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 08:22:51PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:20:35AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 06:53:50PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > ulfs_check is used to update the list of ports to the underlying > > > filesyste

Re: Unionmount: proxying the control port

Hi, On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 08:17:10PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 02:40:49AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > > Well, I don't know exactly why, but I do know that NFS needs some > > stable representation of nodes. I remember how in a talk about some > > Linux f