Re: Hurd Mission Statement

2009-06-10 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Mittwoch, 10. Juni 2009 04:02:18 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net: > I just realized though that it could be made a bit shorter still by > replacing "[...] as much control over their computing environment as > possible" with "[...] maximal control over their computing environment". > What do the

Re: Copyright and license conditions of mailing list texts and the like (was: Hurd Mission Statement)

2009-06-10 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Montag, 8. Juni 2009 20:51:44 schrieb Thomas Schwinge: > You didn't add the copyright and license boilerplate on that page. > Intentionally or just forgotten? Just forgotten - nano doesn't fill them in automatically for me :) > In general, not neccessarily Hurd-specific, is there consensus ``

Re: Headlines: more CSS magic wanted (was: Hurd Mission Statement)

2009-06-10 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Montag, 8. Juni 2009 20:54:43 schrieb Thomas Schwinge: > This is wrong, as -- in my understanding -- these #s are for logical > grouping and not for stating how big these headlines should be rendered > on the screen. In my opinion, all pages (this is wrong in other pages as > well) should use a

Re: Hurd Mission Statement

2009-06-10 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Montag, 8. Juni 2009 20:42:35 schrieb Thomas Schwinge: > > (that's the beauty of using the wiki as staging area for the website: I > > can just change something and upload it, and if it isn't good enough for > > the website, we can work on it till it is). > > That exactly is the idea and I'm gla

Re: Hurd Mission Statement

2009-06-10 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Montag, 8. Juni 2009 15:34:07 schrieb Da Zheng: > I don't get it. Why do you think the open source project isn't free? It's damn semantics: The project he talked about was "free to use *for* open source projects" (that means, if you write a free software project, you don't have to pay for teh

Re: A GNU/Hurd Roadmap dream

2009-06-10 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Dienstag, 9. Juni 2009 07:19:28 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net: > I have been using the Hurd for most of my everyday work for some two > years now. Wow, that's a statement we should have in the wiki! Maybe your whole post as addition to the "status of the GNU/Hurd" site? It's a honest, pr

Re: A GNU/Hurd Roadmap dream

2009-06-10 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Dienstag, 9. Juni 2009 07:27:14 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net: > Anyways, if you want to revive the Gentoo GNU/Hurd port, that would be > great! Unlike a few years back when it was first attempted, the system > is stable enough under load nowadays, to make a source-based > distribution actuall

Re: A GNU/Hurd Roadmap dream

2009-06-10 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 11:26:37PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > On Sunday, 7. June 2009 13:16:04 Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > I remember Duck (I'm awfully sorry for not remembering his real name > > :-( ) mentioning something about compiling kde4libs :-) > > That would be great! > > But I w

Re: Hurd Mission Statement

2009-06-10 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 10:58:28AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > On Monday, 8. June 2009 09:58:03 olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 09:39:51AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > > On Thursday, 4. June 2009 13:45:55 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > > > And

Re: Copyright and license conditions of mailing list texts and the like

2009-06-10 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 08:51:44PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > In general, not neccessarily Hurd-specific, is there consensus ``in > the Net'' and amongst lawyers on what the copyright and licensing > conditions are with respect to putting texts by individuals that > appears on projects'

Re: Hurd Mission Statement

2009-06-10 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 08:58:18PM +1200, Philip Charles wrote: > On Mon, 08 Jun 2009, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > I think it's important to make the mission statement as concise as > > possible. Adding anything more is always a tradeoff. Does it really > > make the statement clearer a

Re: Headlines: more CSS magic wanted

2009-06-10 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 08:54:43PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > This is wrong, as -- in my understanding -- these #s are for logical > grouping and not for stating how big these headlines should be > rendered on the screen. Indeed, the HTML standard explicitely asks that heading levels sh

cmp: the port comparison server

2009-06-10 Thread Carl Fredrik Hammar
Hi, I've been making some progress code-wise with libmob. In particular I have written a working server for secure comparison of ports. And now I would like to ask a few questions that have popped up in the duration. You can get the code here: git://gitorious.org/hurd-cmp/hurd-cmp.git The repo