Re: [PATCH 0/5] Change unionfs argument handling policy

2009-06-09 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 06:32:10PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 01:52:50PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 9:08 PM, wrote: > > > > But now that you mention it, I see that indeed it might be an > > > interesting option to let settrans do a

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Change unionfs argument handling policy

2009-06-09 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 01:52:50PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 9:08 PM, wrote: > > But now that you mention it, I see that indeed it might be an > > interesting option to let settrans do all the setup, and have the > > translator component only serve as a helper...

Re: A GNU/Hurd Roadmap dream

2009-06-09 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 10:55:06PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > On Wednesday, 3. June 2009 17:41:22 Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > Could you please dream how to solve the major drawbacks in Hurd and > > to make it mainstream? :-) [...] > Which are the other drawbacks? > > I don't current

Re: A GNU/Hurd Roadmap dream

2009-06-09 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 10:22:45PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > 5) Gentoo Portage on the GNU/Hurd: Now the work for maintaining the > software bases shrinks massively and more software can be made > available at far lower maintenance cost. I'm not convinced that it really lowers th