Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:09:04AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> OBJS = main.o node.o lnode.o ulfs.o ncache.o netfs.o \
> - lib.o options.o pattern.o stow.o update.o
> + lib.o options.o pattern.o stow.o update.o unionmount.o
"unionmount" is not a good name for a file, when the w
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:03:16AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> @@ -90,6 +96,8 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
>if (err)
> error (EXIT_FAILURE, err, "failed to initialize root node");
>
> + ulfs_check ();
> +
>/* Map the time, used for updating node information. */
>err =
Hi,
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:31:54PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> -# Hurd unionfs
> -# Copyright (C) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> -# Written by Jeroen Dekkers .
> +# Hurd unionmount
> +#
> +# Copyright (C) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2009 Free Software Foundation,
> +# I
Hi,
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 08:48:56PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> In the end, how much code will be shared between unionfs and
> unionmount? Would it perhaps make sense -- in the long term, need not
> be right now -- to transfer the guts of unionfs into a library that
> can then be shared be
Hi,
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:31:49PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> +# Get the information from under /usr.
> +prefix = /usr/
Do NOT hardcode the prefix -- it is a variable for a reason! The user
can change it by setting the environment variable. (For that same
reason, the title of the patch is
Hi,
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:37:19PM +0200, Alessandro Mosca wrote:
> > The mission of the Hurd project is: to create a general-purpose
> > kernel ..
>
> i guess there's something missing in it_
>
> i would say: "a modern general-purpose multiserver microkernel os.."
I intentionally left
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:18:02AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> I could have never supposed that a diff could possibly contain such
> lines... I just didn't look over my patch at all initially...
Please *always* look through your patches.
It's a good policy to look through the diffs before
hi,
> The mission of the Hurd project is: to create a general-purpose
> kernel ..
i guess there's something missing in it_
i would say: "a modern general-purpose multiserver microkernel os.."
the 'modern' part of it means the will to create the sound system, usb
/ wifi stacks,
>128Gb disk I
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:08:06AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> -case OPT_ADD:/* --add */
> - ulfs_mode = ULFS_MODE_ADD;
> - break;
> -
> -case OPT_REMOVE: /* --remove */
> - ulfs_mode = ULFS_MODE_REMOVE;
> - break;
> -
You removed the option
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:00:30AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> >From 6f3e628fa4e90ed1316b2919b2d1a7ea08986b4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sergiu Ivanov
> Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 19:19:23 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] Update Makefile to make unionfs build.
I wonder, is it useful to include
Hi,
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:08:51AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> On Wednesday, 27. May 2009 16:45:52 Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> I hope the niches discussion was useful nontheless.
Definitely! It helped me a lot in getting a clearer picture of these
things.
> The only part I am not perf
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:09:04AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> +/*---*/
> +#include "unionmount.h"
> +/*---*/
> +
> +/*
Hi,
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:31:45PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> I'm posting a series of patches which bring unionfs to an intermediate
> stage on its road towards unionmount:
A generic remark here: Try to post a patch series as a single thread.
git format-patch has some features that are s
Hi,
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:27:33PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> This is not really that important here (and the same applies to my other
> nit-picking by the way -- but you chose to be with those picky Hurd
> people, didn't you?), but as a guideline for forthcoming situations, and
> to mak
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 04:18:55PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 06:44:59PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> I was going to refute your suggestion of ioctl handlers, but in
> arguing about it back and forth with myself, I ended up agreeing with
> you. ;
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> I just dreamed of a Roadmap the Hurd might have - a Roadmap which would be the
> perfect Roadmap for making the Hurd useful for me.
Could you please dream *how* to solve the major drawbacks in Hurd and
to make it mainstream?
Hi Michael,
On Wednesday, 3. June 2009 00:23:50 Michael Banck wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 10:22:45PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > This is the Roadmap I dreamt of:
>
> Sorry, but this is a wishlist, not a roadmap.
Or a dream :)
The difference from a pure wishlist is that there's
17 matches
Mail list logo
