Re: Authority verification

Hi, On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 04:50:56PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 08:48:34AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > What would have been a more appropriate problem to describe, would > have been that if equality test were to be done in the sender (or the > rece

Re: Improving object mobility within the Hurd

Hi, On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 02:17:59PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:39:51AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:54:53AM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > sorry for the late reply. I had written most of the mail quite a > whil

Re: Google Summer of Code 2009; how to fork off the unionfs code base

Hi, On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:21:42PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 11:45 PM, wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:56:04PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > The idea was to create new branches in the existing unionfs > > repository, rather than creating another repositor

Re: Filter design for nsmux

Hi, On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 08:07:37AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:13 PM, wrote: > > The real problem is organisational: changing an existing interface > > is a very fundamental decision, and the current maintainer situation > > regarding the Hurd means that there is