Hello,
writes:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 02:05:44PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
>> I'm going to start implementing the VFS-style union mount
>> functionality (http://preview.tinyurl.com/cpftg2). The current
>> strategy is based on forking off the unionfs code base (retrieved from
>> http://www.
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 08:48:34AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > Note also that it's possible for the sender to trick the receiver to
> > use objects the sender itself does not have access to, in ways they
> > are not expected to be used. Possibly leading to precious da
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 04:29:40PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> writes:
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 09:37:55PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> >> writes:
> >> > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 08:56:50PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > So the idea is to have only the first instance do a full transla
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:46:10PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> I guess this mail turned out to be more of a report on my findings
> rather than to start a discussion. So I'm mostly looking for
> feedback, e.g. if what I'm saying doesn't make sense, if one of my
> assumptions are wron
