Re: Unionmount. Basic details

2009-04-12 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
Hello, Carl Fredrik Hammar writes: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 08:35:07PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: >> Anyway, I'm not sure whether bringing some details in the code in >> unionmount up to date will require ``porting'', since I'm going to touch >> only a very small portion of the code, leaving th

Re: Getting libpthread working again

2009-04-12 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thomas Schwinge, le Sun 12 Apr 2009 17:32:12 +0200, a écrit : > PPS: While digging through the libpthread code I wondered whether for the > Hurd servers cthreads to pthread migration PTHREAD_THREADS_MAX being > defined to 64 might be too small for some heavily multi-threaded Hurd > servers? Where

Getting libpthread working again

2009-04-12 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! When linking the pthread tests against a libpthread built (with Samuel's TLS patches) from CVS HEAD (or any of the Viengoos branches, for that matter) I always get this: $ ./test-1 test-1: ../../HEAD/libpthread/sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386/pt-setup.c:103: __pthread_setup: Unexpected

Re: Is that supposed to happen?

2009-04-12 Thread Samuel Thibault
Roland McGrath, le Sat 11 Apr 2009 18:47:13 -0700, a écrit : > vm_read should return a normal out-of-line page there--it's just an RPC > stub. So yes, there should be a mapping there. Unless there is a race > with a deallocation in another thread or exec, or something, that seems > like a potenti