Hello,
Sorry about the late reply.
On 23/01/2009, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 01:44:59PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > 2009/1/13 :
>
> > > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 06:22:27PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
>
> > > I'm not saying it is impossible to do
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 02:25:31PM -0500, Nathan Gray wrote:
> I believe I am experiencing the same problem as is outlined in this
> thread:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-h...@lists.debian.org/msg19397.html
Oh, I hadn't realized there was already a thread about this once...
In a
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 09:46:30PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:19 AM, wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:55:05PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:01 AM, wrote:
> > For each translator in the original tree, we get one nsmux instance.
>
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 08:50:39PM +, Da Zheng wrote:
> olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
>> The node should go away when it no longer has any users. When pfinet
>> (or some other real user) uses a device, it will probably discard the
>> port to the FS node (resulting from file_name_lookup()
