Jim Meyering has done the cvs->git work for various things on sourceware.
(As I recommended for Hurd some months ago, this can be done in a
noncommittal way before switching from cvs for commits to existing
branches.) He can give you pointers. But AFAIK git-cvsimport alone is
easy enough to get r
Am Freitag 09 Januar 2009 23:05:52 schrieb Roland McGrath:
> Repository conversion is repository conversion. It's not an opportunity to
> rejigger the history. It's a fundamental failure of what the repository is
> there for if it loses or divides the history. There is no problem with the
> size
Hi Thomas. Olaf said some of the things I was thinking.
In short, I think this plan is too clever by half.
Repository conversion is repository conversion. It's not an opportunity to
rejigger the history. It's a fundamental failure of what the repository is
there for if it loses or divides the h
Hello,
Oops, as I don't really care whether CVS/svn/git/whatever is used, I
overlooked this thread
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Fri 09 Jan 2009 09:38:20 +0100, a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 12:05:07AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > For the GNU Mach Xen branch, I'd like Samuel to tell
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 07:20:17PM +, Da Zheng wrote:
> Zheng Da wrote:
>> I just found there is the RPC proc_getallpids, so I can get all
>> processes in the main hurd and then use pid2task to get their task
>> port. I also found that pid2task only works for the tasks that belong
>> to t
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 12:05:07AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Only convert GNU Mach's gnumach-1-branch, GNU MIG's HEAD, GNU Hurd's
> HEAD.
>
> With the exception of the GNU Mach Xen branch and the Hurd GSoC
> branches, these are the only branches that see active development.
So
Hello
2009/1/3 :
[...]
>> Yes, the system provides a service out of the box that provides DRM
>> memory which might be a step towards DRM content protection. I do not
>> like the feature but I have not seen a secure system design without
>> such feature, either.
>
> Well, as I explained, we belie
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 02:35:46PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 31/12/2008, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 12:10:39PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> If you want a POSIX system Coyotos is completely out of question.
>
> I would think that the kernel itse
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 02:42:21PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 8:25 AM, wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 07:19:50PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > The most radical approach would be to actually start a new nsmux
> > instance for each filesystem in the mirrored tr
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 09:11:16PM +, Zheng Da wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:04 AM, wrote:
> > Note that the implementation of the pseudo master host port does not
> > need to forward the RPCs directly to Mach. (In fact, it can't even
> > do that, as it lacks the necessary privileg
10 matches
Mail list logo
