Am Donnerstag 18 Dezember 2008 09:06:15 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> > (by the way: having a user process which manages a non-restricted
> > buffer should give almost the same advantages as giving memory
> > directly to the server, but without the drawbacks. And it should be
> > painless, sin
Am Donnerstag 18 Dezember 2008 16:03:39 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
> > Only if you assume that "security that is actually usable" implies
> > hiding things from the parent process. As I already explained, we
> > believe this assumption to be fundamentally wrong. Get over it.
>
> As I said numerous ti
Hello,
As I know GNU Hurd works now on GNU mach only, and l4 port are not ready.
I have a good skills in OS development (microkernels and microkernel
services design) - mostly within small closed source OSes.
Some time ago I've decide to open some works within this area and create
GNU GPL/LGPL m
2008/12/18 :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:09:19PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> 2008/12/12 :
>
>> I see that the EROS or Coyotos as a whole does not fit the
>> requirements of a GNU system but I think reusing some basic parts is
>> no worse than using any other kernel.
>
> Well, if we
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:34:57PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:28 AM, wrote:
> I'll put my question differently: are we going to return the control
> ports (that is, ports to filesystem) inside a instances of struct node
> (provided libnetfs) as it happens in the c
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 07:30:53PM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Samstag 06 Dezember 2008 22:17:12 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> > So you have offlist discussions, have you? I feel left out ;-)
>
> The discussion stumbled offline since Michal accidently only answered
> to me
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:13:04PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 10:06:54AM +0200, I wrote:
> > For a few weeks now, I seem to notice more and more problems w.r.t.
> > networking. Olaf confirmed this.
Well, not exactly: While I can confirm that disabling syslog fix
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:09:19PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> 2008/12/12 :
> I see that the EROS or Coyotos as a whole does not fit the
> requirements of a GNU system but I think reusing some basic parts is
> no worse than using any other kernel.
Well, if we don't use the constructor m
