Re: L4 etc. (was: GSoC results!)

2008-10-03 Thread Lluis
El Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 02:53:57AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ens deleit� amb les seg�ents paraules: [...] > In fact, the only Hurd-related microkernel work I'm aware of is Neal's > Viengoos stuff -- and even there, although Neal certainly had Hurd's > requirements in mind when creating it, I don'

Re: A New Design of nsmux (discussed on IRC on 2008/09/07)

2008-10-03 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:49:48PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 2:04 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:34:22PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 7:37 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It might be possible though to

PR (was: GSoC results!)

2008-10-03 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 08:54:01AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Samstag 20 September 2008 10:18:34 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > You *did* (and do) great work! Thanks :-) > > All of the others have been doing some work on their projects over > > the past weeks. I don't know the

L4 etc. (was: GSoC results!)

2008-10-03 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:18:34PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > For example I just expanded the Contributing section slightly to > include a six point list with stuff people can do: [...] > - Hurd L4 Note that, while Hurd-related microkernel discussions still tend to happen on the