On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 03:48 +0200, Da Zheng wrote:
> > It sounds as if you got EPERM from store_parse_open, but
> > proc_getprivports is not being called, so you are having trouble
> > understanding why you got an error message at all.
> >
> Yes, exactly.
> > This will depend much on what the st
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 03:38 +0200, Da Zheng wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 01:56 +0200, Da Zheng wrote:
> >
> >>> Yes, but the point here is that *you* are opening that file and
> >>> expecting something to happen. I thought you were writing the program
> >>> whic
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 01:57 +0200, Da Zheng wrote:
I'm trying to make subhurd work without root's permission, so the first
task for me is to find the operations need the privilege.
That's a worthy task.
I have a problem in store_parsed_open().
I believe
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 01:56 +0200, Da Zheng wrote:
Yes, but the point here is that *you* are opening that file and
expecting something to happen. I thought you were writing the program
which would *serve* that file.
I know it's a bit confusing. Then what
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 01:57 +0200, Da Zheng wrote:
> I'm trying to make subhurd work without root's permission, so the first
> task for me is to find the operations need the privilege.
That's a worthy task.
> I have a problem in store_parsed_open().
> I believe store_parse_open() calls dev_open(
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 01:56 +0200, Da Zheng wrote:
> > Yes, but the point here is that *you* are opening that file and
> > expecting something to happen. I thought you were writing the program
> > which would *serve* that file.
> >
> I know it's a bit confusing. Then what should I do?
If you w
Hello,
I'm trying to make subhurd work without root's permission, so the first
task for me is to find the operations need the privilege.
I have a problem in store_parsed_open().
I believe store_parse_open() calls dev_open() if the filesystem of
subhurd is in a disk.
The first privilege operat
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 13:09 +0200, Da Zheng wrote:
The purpose of the translator is to help other programs get the port to
the device, so I suggested if it was OK that file_name_lookup() returns
the port to the device directly.
antrik said it was quite confusing fo
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:31 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:30:56PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > What I wanted to say was that netfs_S_dir_lookup does not give the
> > client retry notifications in case it encounters a symlink (except for
> > the special ca
Why do you think this change is important?
Do you expect this to be applied? If so, you need to include a change
log.
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 01:15:51PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is just a general idea which struck me:
>
> With translators it would be easily possible to hide version tracking
> activity
> by just stacking a version tracking translator over some directory.
>
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 13:09 +0200, Da Zheng wrote:
> The purpose of the translator is to help other programs get the port to
> the device, so I suggested if it was OK that file_name_lookup() returns
> the port to the device directly.
> antrik said it was quite confusing for him because file_name_
Hey,
This patches changes 1 and 2's into STDOUT_FILENO and STDERR_FILENO,
respectively.
Index: boot/boot.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/hurd/hurd/boot/boot.c,v
retrieving revision 1.109
diff -u -r1.109 boot.c
--- boot/boot.c 14 Mar 2006 23
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:55:52AM +0200, Da Zheng wrote:
by the way, which letter should be used for the short option? or
should I just use the long option '--device'?
I think a short option is rather important, as this is likely to be used
often: For r
At Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:46:49 +0200,
Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Since I just skimmed over scheduling, the question bit me, if itis possible
> to
> replace the scheduler in a Hurd system as user.
>
> Is it possible to replace the scheduler for my own processes?
>
> -> The general scheduler
Hi,
This is just a general idea which struck me:
With translators it would be easily possible to hide version tracking activity
by just stacking a version tracking translator over some directory.
A way to control that would then be, to have the translator create virtual
files for control. S
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
The device file is created by a translator to help other user programs
to open the device.
For example, we can create a device file /dev/eth0 with the translator.
When the user program calls file_name_lookup() on the file and
device_open() as I do in the code, I actua
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if (domain <= max_domain)
- servers[domain] = server;
+ servers[domain] = server;
I'm not sure about this, but I think it is usually better to avoid
changing the indentation of code you haven't otherwise touched -- even
if it was wrong before..
Hi,
Since I just skimmed over scheduling, the question bit me, if itis possible to
replace the scheduler in a Hurd system as user.
Is it possible to replace the scheduler for my own processes?
-> The general scheduler governing when which user may act, the user
schedulers governing the proc
[EMAIL PROTECTED], le Mon 25 Aug 2008 21:59:02 +0200, a écrit :
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:46:52AM +0200, Da Zheng wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 03:27:06PM +0200, zhengda wrote:
>
> >>> - socket_t server;
> >>> + socket_t server = MACH_PORT_NULL;
> >>
> >> As
20 matches
Mail list logo
