On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 09:36 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> So you have two ports. When the one going to the user is destroyed, you
> need to tell the device not to send any more packets.
>
> And we have a way to do that: by calling device_set_filter, and clearing
> out the port there. The d
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 13:25 +0200, Da Zheng wrote:
> I have to make sure every ports has been destroyed so when the
> translator exits, it can check if there are still users.
Huh? When the translator exits, all the ports are going to be destroyed
anyway.
> OK, maybe I should make the things mor
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> struct port_info *foo;
> ports_create_port(portclass, bucket, sizeof(*foo), &foo);
>
> ports_port_deref(foo); // ports_port_destroy(foo) doesn't work here.
It works just fine, *if your intention is to delete the receive right*--
a rare and unusual thi
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:13 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 09:11:08PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:53 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > That's why I wonder whether we should do the further lookup in
> > > nsmux, or just let the cl
