On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 00:18 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Madhusudan C.S, le Tue 17 Jun 2008 04:12:42 +0530, a écrit :
> > 1. Is it better to free all those nodes as soon as they are displayed and
> > create them whenever they are required?
>
> Just do that. No need to cache anythi
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 12:59 +0400, A.Salatov wrote:
> No, you correct me if I'm wrong, but when I think about 'settrans' my
> mind always going to compare it to 'umount' and I started to think about
> a reasons why 'umount' is 'umount' and not 'unmount'. The simplest
> reason for it, that I could i
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 21:18 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd agree on the principle to not leave a nul port for stdin/stdout,
> any other opinion on this?
I disagree. Translators don't have such ports, and making them null
encourages programs to write on them, possibly expecting th
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 21:52 +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvsroot/hurd
> Module name: hurd
> Changes by: Samuel Thibault 08/06/09 21:52:12
>
> Modified files:
> libdiskfs : ChangeLog dir-lookup.c
>
> Log message:
> 2008-06-06 Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL P
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 00:12 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrotekfs/dir-lookup.c:478
>
> dir-lookup.c:478 is as follows:
>
> 469 if (! error)
> 470 {
> 471 if (flags & O_EXLOCK)
> 472 error = fshelp_acquire_lock (&np->userlock, &newpi->po->lock_status,
> 473
zhengda wrote:
Hello,
I have checked in my code in my CVS branch, and put the patches in the
http://www.assembla.com/spaces/VNetHurd/documents.
I write a howto to briefly introduce the process of setting up the
system.
http://www.assembla.com/spaces/VNetHurd/documents/boUIuWBsmr3A1lab7jnrAJ/d
Neal H. Walfield wrote:
At Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:37:14 +0200,
zhengda wrote:
Since boot only uses one interface, boot probably accepts only one
interface name from subhurd.
This needn't be the case. In fact, it should be able to expose any
number of objects as devices. A good interface
Neal H. Walfield wrote:
At Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:37:14 +0200,
zhengda wrote:
Since boot only uses one interface, boot probably accepts only one
interface name from subhurd.
This needn't be the case. In fact, it should be able to expose any
number of objects as devices. A good interface
At Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:37:14 +0200,
zhengda wrote:
> Since boot only uses one interface, boot probably accepts only one
> interface name from subhurd.
This needn't be the case. In fact, it should be able to expose any
number of objects as devices. A good interface might be:
-d foo=filename1
Neal H. Walfield wrote:
At Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:48:11 +0200,
zhengda wrote:
2008-07-29 Zheng Da <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* boot/boot.c (ds_device_open): Handle the request to open the virtual
network device.
diff -u boot.old/boot.c boot/boot.c
--- boot.old/boot.c 2008-08-17 18:38:02.
Samuel Thibault wrote:
zhengda, le Tue 19 Aug 2008 17:00:01 +0200, a écrit :
Otherwise, we have to tell pfinet the whole path of the device file. I
think it's a little weird.
Why? We do so for ext2fs and /dev/hd?s?
Ah, I'm stupid.
At first, pfinet, boot and all other components ac
zhengda, le Tue 19 Aug 2008 17:00:01 +0200, a écrit :
> Otherwise, we have to tell pfinet the whole path of the device file. I
> think it's a little weird.
Why? We do so for ext2fs and /dev/hd?s?
Samuel
Neal H. Walfield wrote:
At Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:48:11 +0200,
zhengda wrote:
2008-07-29 Zheng Da <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* boot/boot.c (ds_device_open): Handle the request to open the virtual
network device.
diff -u boot.old/boot.c boot/boot.c
--- boot.old/boot.c 2008-08-17 18:38:02.
Hello,
I have checked in my code in my CVS branch, and put the patches in the
http://www.assembla.com/spaces/VNetHurd/documents.
I write a howto to briefly introduce the process of setting up the
system.
http://www.assembla.com/spaces/VNetHurd/documents/boUIuWBsmr3A1lab7jnrAJ/download/howto
I
At Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:48:11 +0200,
zhengda wrote:
> 2008-07-29 Zheng Da <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * boot/boot.c (ds_device_open): Handle the request to open the virtual
> network device.
>
> diff -u boot.old/boot.c boot/boot.c
> --- boot.old/boot.c 2008-08-17 18:38:02.0 +0200
> ++
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 07:06:29AM +0200, zhengda wrote:
But the way to open the virtual network interface will be changed if
the translator that helps open the device is created.
Indeed... So I guess we better don't commit it just yet :-)
2008-07-2
Samuel Thibault wrote:
zhengda, le Sun 17 Aug 2008 13:40:59 +0200, a écrit :
I wonder how I return ENOMEM? Does asprintf() write the errno itself?
Yes.
Should the function returns immediately after __asprintf() returns error?
It has to clean its mess first of course.
He
17 matches
Mail list logo
