Re: New machine for shitbox

On 7/5/08, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dani Doni, le Sat 05 Jul 2008 13:52:07 +0200, a écrit : > > > On 7/5/08, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dani Doni, le Sat 05 Jul 2008 13:21:29 +0200, a écrit : > > > > > > > On 7/5/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: New machine for shitbox

Dani Doni, le Sat 05 Jul 2008 13:52:07 +0200, a écrit : > On 7/5/08, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dani Doni, le Sat 05 Jul 2008 13:21:29 +0200, a écrit : > > > > > On 7/5/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > On the other hand, the wiki

Re: New machine for shitbox

On 7/5/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi folks, > On the other hand, the wiki seems to need a fast machine, so using it > for the wiki exclusively would be a waste... > Not sure what the best approach is. Ideally, they should run in two > distinct VMs sharing the hardware :-)

Re: New machine for shitbox

Dani Doni, le Sat 05 Jul 2008 13:21:29 +0200, a écrit : > On 7/5/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > > On the other hand, the wiki seems to need a fast machine, so using it > > for the wiki exclusively would be a waste... > > Not sure what the best approach is. Idea

Re: New machine for shitbox

On 7/5/08, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dani Doni, le Sat 05 Jul 2008 13:21:29 +0200, a écrit : > > > On 7/5/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > > On the other hand, the wiki seems to need a fast machine, so using it > > > for the wiki exclus