Hi,
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:42:43PM +0200, zhengda wrote:
> The new version of the patch is below.
Hm, what about dropping/replacing the "_PATH" bit, as discussed in the
other subthread?...
> I wonder if I can use __snprintf(). The code in the original glibc
> doesn't use it.
I'm not a glib
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 10:56:17PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> I'm still a little concerned about the HD but I'm not sure how much
> trouble it would be to get it up on a new one. I'm up for
> suggestions, etc.
Shouldn't be a problem I think... Just copy the whole disk :-)
> I also ha
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:24:56AM +0200, zhengda wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So if I'm right, the filter translator has to implement the RPC in
> device.defs to communicate with the client and it calls the RPC to
> communicate with the multiplexer.
Yes. The filter simply proxies the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note however that making the multiplexer handle rules both from the
clients and from filter translators is not trivial. It requires figuring
out how to merge rules correctly; it requires making sure that the
client can never override rules set by the filter translator.
T
