New machine for shitbox

2008-07-03 Thread Barry deFreese
Hi folks, OK, I have finally put a new machine in for shitbox. It's still not super high-end (700Mhz PIII with 384Mb) but it should at least be more stable and come back up when rebooting. I also did a dist-upgrade. I hope that wasn't a bad thing. I'm still a little concerned about the HD

Re: Revision control

2008-07-03 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 09:24:29AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Sonntag 29 Juni 2008 06:21:16 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Just let your system look at the combined diff of all changesets the > user added during the time he did a specific project, then you > effectively have a cle

Re: The patch of glibc which allows the user to override the pfinet server

2008-07-03 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:39:23PM +0200, zhengda wrote: > Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote: >> http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#GNU-Manuals >> >> # Please do not use the term ???pathname??? that is used in Unix # >> documentation; use ???file name??? (two words) instead. We use th

Re: A proxy of the proc server for translators

2008-07-03 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 03:10:13PM +0200, zhengda wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> AIUI every process has it's own port for proc, right? >> >> So I think all you need to do is for every client that contacts the >> proc proxy, to create a distinct port to the real proc server, and >> forwa

Re: The patch of glibc which allows the user to override the pfinet server

2008-07-03 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 03:14:47PM +0200, zhengda wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Do you mean the indentation here? It is caused by '-' and '+' in the >>> beginning of lines. >>> >> >> Ah, I see it now. That shouldn't happen, though. How did you generate >> the patch? >> > for

Re: GSoC: the plan for the project network virtualization

2008-07-03 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 04:44:36PM +0200, zhengda wrote: > I said the multiplexer (or the hypervisor, I'm not very sensitive to > the name:-) can have multiple interfaces and there was a "filter" > behind every interface. The filter here actually means the BPF > implementation (maybe this