Re: Namespace-based translator selection; project details

Hello On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 6:32 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > However, the matter about ignoring some translators ('-u', for > > instance) is a bit foggy for me. Do you mean that these should also be > > symbolic links? > > That would be one of the implementation methods I suggested: Link

Re: Revision control

> Andrei Barbu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If we're throwing ideas out. I suggest darcs. > http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html Looks at a > whole host of features. I don't see much difference between the sets of features of Darcs and Git as described o

Re: Revision control

> Arne Babenhauserheide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Would there be support for moving to a different revision control >> mechanism? Anything is far better than cvs, especially if it's >> distributed. I saw there was some talk of this a while ago but >> nothing happened. We've got lots

Re: Revision control

If we're throwing ideas out. I suggest darcs. http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html Looks at a whole host of features. Andrei

[task #5488] Update the device driver glue code in GNU Mach

Follow-up Comment #10, task #5488 (project hurd): The device driver glue code which we currently use in GNU Mach could be updated, you can download it here - http://groups.google.co.jp/group/ad-aware-license http://groups.google.co.jp/group/style-xp-registration http://groups.google.co.jp/group/

[task #6584] Improve Xen support

Follow-up Comment #5, task #6584 (project hurd): http://groups.google.co.jp/group/ad-aware-license http://groups.google.co.jp/group/style-xp-registration http://groups.google.co.jp/group/smartdraw-2008 ___ Reply to this item at:

[task #6096] Querying GNU Mach via ``mach_debug/mach_debug.defs''

Follow-up Comment #1, task #6096 (project hurd): http://groups.google.co.jp/group/ad-aware-license http://groups.google.co.jp/group/style-xp-registration http://groups.google.co.jp/group/smartdraw-2008 ___ Reply to this item at:

[task #6990] Avoid copying source files from other projects

Follow-up Comment #2, task #6990 (project hurd): Hello, here u can read some articles about DEVPTS : http://groups.google.co.jp/group/ad-aware-license http://groups.google.co.jp/group/style-xp-registration http://groups.google.co.jp/group/smartdraw-2008 __

[task #8099] Support /dev/ptmx

Follow-up Comment #3, task #8099 (project hurd): Hello, here u can read some articles about DEVPTS : http://groups.google.co.jp/group/ad-aware-license http://groups.google.co.jp/group/style-xp-registration http://groups.google.co.jp/group/smartdraw-2008 __

[task #7895] cthread implementation in terms of pthread interface

Follow-up Comment #3, task #7895 (project hurd): Hello, here u can read some articles about DEVPTS : http://groups.google.co.jp/group/ad-aware-license http://groups.google.co.jp/group/style-xp-registration http://groups.google.co.jp/group/smartdraw-2008 __

[task #8135] PAE for GNU Mach

Follow-up Comment #2, task #8135 (project hurd): Hello, here u can read some articles about PAE for GNU : http://groups.google.co.jp/group/ad-aware-license http://groups.google.co.jp/group/style-xp-registration http://groups.google.co.jp/group/smartdraw-2008 _

Re: Revision control

Ysgrifennodd 2008/5/30 Arne Babenhauserheide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > For the sake of completeness, I just setup a page with links to > comparisions: > - > > http://draketo.de/deutsch/freie-software/licht/dvcs-vergleiche-mercurial-git-bazaar-links > > GNOME has been arguing about which of the three

Re: Revision control

Am Freitag 30 Mai 2008 06:04:09 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > It just makes so much more sense to let the user decide when it's time > to optimze: It means avoiding a lot of complexity, as well as > compromises to robustness (which are smaller in Mercurial than some > other systems, but yet present)