> I don't get this: Why implement module loading just for this? Can't
> SystemTap be just statically linked in gnumach? Or are the actual test
> functions compiled and loaded as modules in SystemTap?...
>
SystemTap itself doesn't get to sit in the Linux kernel. Linux exposes
an in-kernel API calle
Hi,
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 07:23:49PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 8:49 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, which would be the average size of a translator stack in
> your opinion? I don't think my assessment of the situation is really
> well-founded, by I suppo
Hi,
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:34:41PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> and the wiki already uses git anyway (even though I prefer Mercurial
> myself, since it feels more natural to me and doesn't have to be
> cleaned up regularly
Well, I can't comment on the "natural" part, as I don't know
Hi again,
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 04:20:12PM -0400, Andrei Barbu wrote:
> 2 This one is ugly, and I'd rather not do it. It involves adding
> module loading support to do the same thing that SystemTap does on
> Linux. Compile code, add a prelude so that it becomes a regular
> module, load it in an
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:34:41PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> I like the idea.
>>
>> It would lower the barrier to begin coding on the hurd (I think), and it
>> would
>> be a good opportunity to clean up the cv
