Re: Namespace-based translator selection; project details

2008-05-26 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 06:50:47PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:07 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The idea is much clearer for me now :-) As far as I can understand, > the namespace-based translator selection will _not_ modify the > filesystem permanently. Instead

Re: dtrace/systemtap options

2008-05-26 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 04:20:12PM -0400, Andrei Barbu wrote: > I've been thinking about all of the various ways to get either Dtrace > or SystemTap working. I've come up with 4 options: > [...] On the downside this is inherently R/O, although that does > increase security significantly. I

Re: dtrace/systemtap options

2008-05-26 Thread Andrei Barbu
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED], le Mon 26 May 2008 21:25:33 +0200, a écrit : >> Maybe you actually mean that RW increases the risk of crashing?... >> (Well, what fun would there be in system development, without the >> prospect of reg

Re: Thoughts about the Lisp bindings project

2008-05-26 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 09:04:49PM +0100, Flávio Cruz wrote: > Here's what I pretend to do during the summer session for GSOC: A little side node: You are regularily using "pretend" in a manner that doesn't quite fit the context in English, and in fact is quite amusing :-) > Will involve th

Re: dtrace/systemtap options

2008-05-26 Thread Samuel Thibault
[EMAIL PROTECTED], le Mon 26 May 2008 21:25:33 +0200, a écrit : > Maybe you actually mean that RW increases the risk of crashing?... > (Well, what fun would there be in system development, without the > prospect of regular crashes? ;-) ) BTW, I'm not sure to understand: what does RW means? Being