Re: client-side memory buffers

On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Neal H. Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:01:25 -0600, > Joshua Stratton wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Neal H. Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > Please don't top post. > > > > > > At Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:48:02 -060

[bug #17651] pci config space access from userspace

Update of bug #17651 (project hurd): Depends on: => task #7840 ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Messa

Requesting to Review of the proposal - Improved NFS Implementation

Hi Olaf and all, My proposal is given below. I request you to review it and give suggestions on any kind of mistakes so that I can improve my proposal. Greetings! I wish to provide an improved Network Filesystem support to "the Hurd". This implementation will be an impro

A small query regarding the schedule

Hi Olaf and all the mentors, In the proposal I will be submitting for Improved NFS implementation, I have divided the entire schedule into 2 major stages with each stage consisting of several phases. The first stage is to analyze, design and complete the NFSv2 implementation and then the

Re: Hurdish TCP stack

Hi, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A filesystem based interface is much easier to use for most programmers > than generic RPCs. It's easier to use from a shell, not from a C program. > In this particular case however I don't see the need for a specialised > RPC interface -- neither is performanc

Re: Hurdish TCP stack

Hi, Lluis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm just an sneaker in many lists but... does Hurd support introspection? > Or has any plan to support it? In that case there could be an introspection > translator for supporting such fs constructs (all by free with a single > translator... after payin