Re: ``struct stat'' issue

Hello! On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 07:49:34PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > In stat.h, the pedantic-mode members need to be called nsec, not usec. > They are just another name for the struct timespec, which is ns, not us. I changed that and aligned to the Linux version. > Other stat.h changes unre

Re: ``struct stat'' issue

Thomas Schwinge, le Fri 05 Oct 2007 15:29:27 +0200, a écrit : > On follow-up: do we want to modify all of the Hurd libraries and servers > (plus the GNU Mach maptime interface!) to also work on ``struct > timespec'' (with nanosecond resolution) instead of ``time_value_t'' (with > microsecond resolu

Re: ``struct stat'' issue

Hello! On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 11:35:20PM +0200, I wrote: > Some months ago I created some patches for the ``struct stat'' issue > (). Perhaps now the time has come > for someone to review them? It's been some further months now, but I finally sat down and re

Re: [PATCH] noatime even for dirs

Hello! On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 11:26:59PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > The --noatime option of libdiskfs can be used to drop the update of the > atime field, which speeds I/O up. However, ext2fs, fatfs and ufs don't > honour that option for directories: they always update the atime. Here > is