Re: Yet another updated entropy patch

2007-07-22 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
At Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:53:05 +0200, Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 01:52:39AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > At Thu, 19 Jul 2007 01:40:12 +0200, > > Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What do you perceive as the benefit of having the entropy

Re: Maintenance of the Hurd parts in glibc (was: about GNU Hurd)

2007-07-22 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 02:36:32PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote: > There may be a misunderstanding. Two different issues were raised: > getting Hurd-related changes into Glibc, and getting changes into the > Hurd. Well yes. While the glibc issue seems to have turned out mostly a communica

Re: Channel sessions

2007-07-22 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 03:56:41PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > Having special channel classes (or perhaps some other type of modules) > for it seems like the right way to go. But the problem that these > channels can live in several translators remain. OK, let's look at an example:

Re: Maintenance of the Hurd parts in glibc

2007-07-22 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 02:36:32PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote: > There may be a misunderstanding. Two different issues were raised: > getting Hurd-related changes into Glibc, and getting changes into the Hurd. > Here I'm talking about appointing another Hurd maintainer to get changes >

Re: Maintenance of the Hurd parts in glibc (was: about GNU Hurd)

2007-07-22 Thread Richard Stallman
There may be a misunderstanding. Two different issues were raised: getting Hurd-related changes into Glibc, and getting changes into the Hurd. Here I'm talking about appointing another Hurd maintainer to get changes installed in the Hurd itself. ___ B

Re: [bug #17647] glibc: GCC 4.1

2007-07-22 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 11:27:58PM +0100, I wrote: > The patch for glibc follows: Here is an updated version, ready for inclusion as far as I'm concerned. 2007-07-22 Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386/init-first.c: Undo parts of Roland's `r 1.43'

Re: Channel sessions

2007-07-22 Thread Carl Fredrik Hammar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:35:01PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > >> Suppose we want to record some audio which we may read from >> /dev/sound/audio, which is a channelio translator. Additionaly we >> want to broadcast the audio onto our internet radio st

[Bug manual/3665] errno 118 assigned twice (ECANCELED and ENOTSUP)

2007-07-22 Thread tschwinge at gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tschwinge at gnu dot org 2007-07-22 12:46 --- This patch has been applied; now `mach/hurd/bits/errno.h' has to be regenerated. A patch has been posted in . -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show

[Bug hurd/3560] ``Lowlevel primitives for ld.so not implemented''

2007-07-22 Thread samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org
--- Additional Comments From samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org 2007-07-21 21:45 --- This is not needed in CVS HEAD any more. Debian has a workaround for 2.6. -- What|Removed |Added --