[bug #17338] GNU Mach vs. GCC 4.1

2006-09-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
Update of bug #17338 (project hurd): Status: In Progress => Fixed Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

Re: [patch] ISA-support in GNU Mach PCMCIA core

2006-09-18 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 09:37:05PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > * i386/linux/configure: Regenerate. > * i386/linux/device-drivers.h.in: Likewise. > > * i386/linux/configure.ac (AC_PCMCIA_OPTION): New function. I thought one mentiones the configure: Regenerate after what promp

[bug #17338] GNU Mach vs. GCC 4.1

2006-09-18 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Update of bug #17338 (project hurd): Assigned to:None => sthibaul ___ Follow-up Comment #5: Ok. Please check in file #10478 (patch-gnumach-seg-1) and then mark this bug as `fixed' and `clos

Re: [patch] ISA-support in GNU Mach PCMCIA core

2006-09-18 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 03:26:55AM +0200, Stefan Siegl wrote: > The patch along adds yet another configure option (enable-pcmcia-isa), > allowing to compile that bits in. The latter is especially useful if > your PCMCIA bridge, attached to the PCI bus, doesn't get an IRQ itself. > In this c

[bug #17338] GNU Mach vs. GCC 4.1

2006-09-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #17338 (project hurd): > + short pad; > Why do we need that padding field at all? Because there are arrays of struct pseudo_descriptor, which the hardware _require_ to have this big items. ___ Reply to thi

[bug #17338] GNU Mach vs. GCC 4.1

2006-09-18 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Update of bug #17338 (project hurd): Status: Confirmed => In Progress ___ Follow-up Comment #3: Quoting from file #10478 (patch-gnumach-seg-1): #v+ [...] --- i386/i386/seg.h 5 Apr 2001 06:3