Re: Hurd source tree; inter-directory dependencies

2006-04-03 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 06:07:57PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Bas, Hi, > > There's one major hack in there: automake doesn't support += on things like > > bin_PROGRAMS, so I had to create temporary variables for it and do > > bin_PROGRAMS = $(programs). > > This sounds awfully like a bug

Re: Hurd source tree; inter-directory dependencies

2006-04-03 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Bas, * Bas Wijnen wrote on Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:58:47AM CEST: > > In one of my projects, I use the nonrecursive approach, but I still have a > Makefile.am per directory. Yes, it's a good idea to group things this way (by using included Makefile.am snippets) > Automake obviously isn't buil

ext2fs.static crashing at start-up (was: kernel debugger)

2006-04-03 Thread Thomas Schwinge
[CCed to bug-hurd.] On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 02:46:53PM +0300, Constantine Kousoulos wrote: > The problem appears when the binary /hurd/ext2fs.static executes. > > Don't i need the source file as well to debug the binary? Uh, I don't really know how I'd start to debug `ext2fs.static' crashing at

Re: Hurd source tree; inter-directory dependencies

2006-04-03 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 04:29:29AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Thomas Schwinge wrote on Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 11:42:28AM CEST: > > > > In the old build system we had the very conventient feature that you > > could `make progb' from the top level build directory and it would > > automagically