- Original Message -
From: "Ashish Gokhale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "BUG Hurd"
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: Checking out /gnumach exits with error,cause 'aux' reserved on
cvsnt
Hi Thomas,
I get error "cvs server: cannot find module
`gnumach-1-branch' - ign
Ashish Gokhale wrote:
> I am trying "cvs -d
> :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sources/hurd
> co gnumach-1-branch". Is the server URL correct???
the right command line is:
cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sources/hurd co -r
gnumach-1-branch gnumach
pietro.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 08:39:38PM +, Ashish Gokhale wrote:
> I get error "cvs server: cannot find module
> `gnumach-1-branch' - ignored".
>
> I am trying "cvs -d
> :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sources/hurd
> co gnumach-1-branch". Is the server URL correct???
#v+
$ cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTE
Hi Thomas,
I get error "cvs server: cannot find module
`gnumach-1-branch' - ignored".
I am trying "cvs -d
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sources/hurd
co gnumach-1-branch". Is the server URL correct???
yet I dont have a linux or debian box available, is
there any way i could down load latest GnuMach
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 12:34:29PM -, samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot
org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org
> 2006-02-12 12:34 ---
> Created an attachment (id=863)
> --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=863&action=view
Hi,
On 2/15/06, Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can however deduce the need for a file in the top-level directory
> containing something like ``If you want to work on the Mach kernel's core
> or system dependent parts or ..., be sure to reset your CVS checkout to
> the revision `gnu
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:27:02PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Thomas Schwinge, le Mon 13 Feb 2006 12:48:16 -0500, a ?crit :
> > 2006-02-13 Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * i386/util/gdt.h: Likewise.
> > * i386/util/gdt_sels.h: Likewise.
> > * i386/util/ldt.h: Likewi
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 11:15:32PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Is there some kind of logic to how you split up the ChangeLog entries?
What exactly don't you understand about it?
> How did you check that the files are ok to remove (it is a long list,
> so it is hard to check each file)?
I ch
