Sergio Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh, ok. Could you please help me to ask _all the things involved_ by
> this...
Sorry, this is now in realm of just the same generic "tell me
everything!" question.
As for Mach, no, I don't have time to answer whatever unasked
questions someone might imp
El sáb, 27-08-2005 a las 19:10 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG escribió:
> Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
(...)
> So, to sum up, if you have a question about design, ask a question.
> Questions are in the interrogative mood, come complete with question
> marks, and so forth.
>
Oh, ok
Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Questions have been asked on this mailing list, for example those whose
> headers I just quoted in my previous message.
> | http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2005-08/msg00076.html>
This is not a question; it is a libc patch.
> | http://list
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are the Hurd developers interested in any new Mach design
> changes/feature additions?
Probably not. Mach != Hurd.
> Neal and Marcus don't seem to (concentrating
> on Hurd/L4 instead), so this leaves Thomas and Roland apparently.
> Sergio proposed/
This is not a bad thing per se if you guys don't feel like working on
Mach anymore, but it would probably be good to communicate this clearly
to people either way, as some still seem to be interested in hacking on
it.
Since at least one of the two GNU maintainers for the Hurd (Mar
You could have asked for a simple super-duper experimental CVS branch,
or simply given good reasons to add it to a less experimental branch
like ams-branch.
If Sergio needs more flexibility in order to espontaneous commit his
(and other people) experimental/untested patches, i think t
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 02:09:13PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It's very unfortunate for developers that are not (yet ?) that intimate
> > with the Hurd and GNU Mach that there is nearly no one available to be
> > asked about e.g. design issue
Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's very unfortunate for developers that are not (yet ?) that intimate
> with the Hurd and GNU Mach that there is nearly no one available to be
> asked about e.g. design issues; things that are more tricky than fixing
> simple bugs, etc.
Please ask,
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 02:09:52PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Sergio Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The problem isn't the patches itself. Don't belive to Alfred, I'm not
> > claiming to put any patch into the CVS. I'm just asking some design
> > issues, to know what's the proper
Sergio Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem isn't the patches itself. Don't belive to Alfred, I'm not
> claiming to put any patch into the CVS. I'm just asking some design
> issues, to know what's the proper direction to take so this work can
> someday become part of the Hurd.
Welp, as
You could have asked for a simple super-duper experimental CVS branch,
or simply given good reasons to add it to a less experimental branch
like ams-branch. Instead, you spread lies, just don't want to
cooperate, and in the most disgusting way try to blame it on me who
offered a helping hand.
__
El sáb, 27-08-2005 a las 19:54 +0200, Marco Gerards escribió:
> Sergio Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Sorry for bothering you, but is there some kind of "magic word" to
> > attract the attention from Hurd's Maintainers?
>
> You are not bothering anyone. You have done a lot of amazing wo
The patches are huge, the touch lots of things, they change
interfaces, they are untested. Applying them blindly (i.e. ASAP) is a
complete mistake. Sergio's copyright assignment status is also vauge.
All these issues must be fixed, discussed and _tested_.
__
Sergio Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry for bothering you, but is there some kind of "magic word" to
> attract the attention from Hurd's Maintainers?
You are not bothering anyone. You have done a lot of amazing work and
it would be nice if your patches can be applied ASAP. Perhaps if y
Unless you or anyone else starts paying someone to `deal with
development', you shouldn't expect switft responses. They will come
when they come.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
[ CCed to Marcus, Neal, Roland and Thomas. ]
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 03:38:30AM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> This issues (there're many more, but I only took the most recent ones)
> are still waiting for attention:
> [...]
Many more, too. Indeed.
It's very unfortunate for developers that are no
-
$B5U!o8r:](B $B"v5U!o8r:](B
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED];~Be$O=*$j$^$7$?!#Ev%5%$%H$O5U!o4uK>[EMAIL
PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]<+M3$KA*$Y$k%7%9%F%`$r:NMQ$7$F$$$^$9!#(B
$B"[EMAIL PROTECTED](B $B!D(B [EMAIL
PROTECTED]>DD$7$F(BOK!!
[EMAIL
::
:: ИСПОЛЬЗУЙ
ВСЕ ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ E-MAIL РЕКЛАМЫ ::
::
::
::
::
Деловая Москва (1.200.000 адресов)
- 5000 рублей
Деловой Питер (300.000 адресов)
- 2000 рублей
Деловой СНГ (1.300.000 адресов)
18 matches
Mail list logo
