[EMAIL PROTECTED]
¡¡-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@f«EpXgEnCq[
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@`ßéßtF`æE®æÌóÉ`--
Hello,
Thank you for your interest in AAA+ Louis Vuitton Replica Beautiful Bags.
Our mission at Couture Sisters is to offer the hottest styles and trends in
Louis Vuitton Replica handbags and accessories at tremendous savings and
convenience to our customers. We search around the clock to buil
Please move this to gnu-system-discuss, it is more suitable for this
kind of thing.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Forgive the long-windedness, but there are some misunderstandings I'd
like to straighten out, and I'd like to be thorough. Off-topic for
bug-hurd; Mail-Followup-To set. Feel free to ignore this, but in that
case please don't hold too dearly to any bad impressions you have
about slashpackage, beca
Ignore my last e-mail Roland. It appears that attr is using GNU/Linux
syscalls instead of the glibc functions. I have re-built attr without
syscalls.c and some of the functions are working so I need to do some more
testing/investigation.
Thanks,
Barry (aka bddebian)
___
What I intended to say was: "All the other projects I was able to
contributed to, because they have their source code open, so that
one can get it, dig through it, hack it, contribute to, [...]".
Probably I should have used "source available" instead of "open
source" to avoid certain
- Original Message -
From: "Roland McGrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 6:58 PM
Subject: new version of glibc xattr patch
This adds the missint {f,}{list,remove}xattr functions.
Not tested in the slightest.
OK, here are the results from the latest attempt of gl
I was directed to you as the person to talk with about potential fraud. I
don't want to point any fingers yet, but things aren't adding up and there
has either been a systematic error in AP or someone is intentionally
pulling strings. This appears to be a serious risk management issue and I
would
At Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:04:28 +0100,
Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are you suggesting something we
> > should do, or what is this about?
>
> It only was a heads-up: I'm doing this and that and it's working for me.
> I gave this introduction to show what I (and others) are doing, th
(B
(B
(B$B:r:#!"L5NA$H$&$?$$:>5=$^$,$$$N%5%$%H$,B?$$$G$9$,?7$7$/40A4L5NA$G0B?4$N7G<(HD(B$B$r:n$j$^$7$?!#$BBS!&#P#C$,;H$($^$9!#B~:#!"L5NA2q0wBgBgJg=8Cf$G$9!#(B
(B
(B$B3Z$7$/;H$C$FL5NA$G$9!*(B
(B
(B$B!zEl5~%i%V%9%H!<%j!http://loves.qsv20.com/
(B
(B$B!T$4Cm0U!U(B18$B:PL$K~$NJ}$
МВК-Сервис
Волгоградский
проспект д. 26. офис 604
__
тел.: 589-77-04; 975-81-65; факс
670-08-71
Разрешение на
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:35:29AM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> This is all very well, but could you give us some context why you
> posted this here in the first place?
Alfred wanted to know which flags I used to configure glibc on GNU/Hurd.
I told him.
He asked why I'd have to use '--prefix=[
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:57:48AM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>> We don't do open source here.
>
>Sure you do.
>
> No we don't, we do Free Software.
I am aware of that.
> Free Software and open source are
> different movements; the former cares about freedom, the later does
> not.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:17:32AM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>>I have to use './configure [...] --prefix=[...]
>>--with-headers=[...]' because I have every package installed
>>into its own hierarchy of
>>
>> Then your system is broken.
>
>That's an intere
14 matches
Mail list logo
