はじめまして。ミナエといいます。

$B%_%J%($H$^$9!#%;%C%/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&$JAje$K$"$j$^$9!*!*(B $B$3$3$^$GFI$s$G!"$b$&$*J,$+$j$G$7$g$&$,!"=h=w$G$9!#(B $B=h=w$C$F$N$O$-$C$HLLE]$H;W$o$l$k$G$7$g$&$+$i6bA,E*$J$b$N$rDs6!$7$?$$$G$9!#(B $B;d$N7n<}$O(B95$BK|$G$9!#(B $B$=$3$+$i!"=h=w$H$$$&LLE]$J;d$rAjhttp://lists.gnu.org/mail

Re: [patch #3346] GNUMach: ifdef DEBUG -> ifndef NDEBUG

> I agree with Neal. I can test it before I commit it as Neal requested. > > Roland, OK to commit? That looks fine to me. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: [patch #3346] GNUMach: ifdef DEBUG -> ifndef NDEBUG

I agree with Neal. I can test it before I commit it as Neal requested. Roland, OK to commit? Thanks. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: [patch #3346] GNUMach: ifdef DEBUG -> ifndef NDEBUG

Guillem, This patch looks good. It enables the major debugging machinery without all of the status output that my patch also turned on. I remember that there were some places that did sanity checks in the DEBUG sections (which is why I changed enabled them), however, isolating those from the sta

Re: [patch #3346] GNUMach: ifdef DEBUG -> ifndef NDEBUG

Hi, On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:35:11AM -0400, Neal H. Walfield wrote: > [patch #3346] Full Item Snapshot: > > URL: > Project: The GNU Hurd > Submitted by: Neal H. Walfield > On: Tue 09/07/04 at 14:29 > Category: GNU Mach > Summary:

Confidant.

Dear Sir, I am Dieter Plaumann and I represent Mr. Mikhail Khordokovsky the former C.E.O of Yukos Oil Company in Russia. I have a very sensitive and confidential brief from this top (oligarch) to ask for your partnership in re-profiling funds over US$450 million. I will give the details, b