car audio

2004-07-15 Thread Ling
Dear Sirs, Nice to contact with you! we have your name over the internet. I am venturing to write you this email for introducing our company as one of the professional exporters of car audio in China.  I am Ling Zhou, sales representative from Zhuhai Astro-win Import and Export

Re: console-client signal handling

2004-07-15 Thread Roland McGrath
> Well, I could do that. Normally (on modern systems) it is used to > restart the program. SIGHUP is conventionally used that way for daemons that do not use a terminal. The primary meaning of SIGHUP is to tell you that your terminal went away. ___ B

Re: Booting Debian GNU/Hurd

2004-07-15 Thread Marco Gerards
"Евгений А.Симоненко " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Size of file system is >2 Gb (~4 Gb). This is too big. Better use a smaller filesystem. A 4GB filesystem only works with a patched Hurd build, which is not easy to set up when you are new to GNU/Hurd, I think. -- Marco ___

Re: console-client signal handling

2004-07-15 Thread Marco Gerards
Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ognyan Kulev wrote: >> Marco Gerards wrote: >>> Many people complain on IRC about the console client and that it does >>> not catch the signals. So when you send a SIGTERM signal to the >>> console it does not correctly clean up its state. The same is t

Re: console-client signal handling

2004-07-15 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was not too sure about SIGQUIT. I thought it is used to create a > corefile and normally is not caught. I could easily add this if this > is sane. No no, SIGQUIT should leave everything alone so that it can be debugged. __

Re: console-client signal handling

2004-07-15 Thread Marco Gerards
Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Marco Gerards wrote: >> Many people complain on IRC about the console client and that it does >> not catch the signals. So when you send a SIGTERM signal to the >> console it does not correctly clean up its state. The same is true >> for the SIGINT sign

Re: console-client signal handling

2004-07-15 Thread Ognyan Kulev
Ognyan Kulev wrote: Marco Gerards wrote: Many people complain on IRC about the console client and that it does not catch the signals. So when you send a SIGTERM signal to the console it does not correctly clean up its state. The same is true for the SIGINT signal. Why not add SIGQUIT too? Or SIGH

Re: console-client signal handling

2004-07-15 Thread Ognyan Kulev
Marco Gerards wrote: Many people complain on IRC about the console client and that it does not catch the signals. So when you send a SIGTERM signal to the console it does not correctly clean up its state. The same is true for the SIGINT signal. Why not add SIGQUIT too? Regards, ogi __