Re: [linux 2.6 patch] ext2 support for hurd extensions via xattr interface

2004-02-27 Thread Roland McGrath
Firstly, you are using the second patch I posted, not the first, right? > For the record, it is possible to create an ext3 file system with '-o > hurd', mount it as ext2 and then benefit from CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XATTR_HURD. If you want a useful record, then try it and record the results. Off hand, I

Re: [linux 2.6 patch] ext2 support for hurd extensions via xattr interface

2004-02-27 Thread Michael Banck
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 04:50:58PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > Firstly, you are using the second patch I posted, not the first, right? Yes. > > > > 1.) Quite often (seemingly random) a bogus gnu.author gets displayed by > > getfattr: > > > > blackbird/mnt$ getfattr -Rh -d -m '.*' gnu/servers

E-MAIL рассылки от профи!

2004-02-27 Thread e-reklama.
Title: Планируете рекламную акцию в Интернет Люди кажутся друг другу глупы преимущественно от того, что хотят казаться умнее. ТОЛСТОЙ Лев Николаевич гыгыПлаанируете реккламную акццию в Инттернет?

Re: [linux 2.6 patch] ext2 support for hurd extensions via xattr interface

2004-02-27 Thread Philip Charles
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Danilo Segan wrote: > Hi Philip, > > Philip Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > If the patched linux kernel is used with mkfs then it produces a hurd fs > > that is free from the 1-2Gb limit? > > You don't need "patched linux kernel" to build larger ext2 filesystems >

Re: [linux 2.6 patch] ext2 support for hurd extensions via xattr interface

2004-02-27 Thread Michael Banck
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 07:55:25PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > > Just curious, would it not make sense to have this for ext3, too? After > > all, one can mount ext3 filesystems as ext2 on GNU/Hurd (AFAIK), > > As I understand it, it is true that an ext3 filesystem with its journal > files full

Re: wrong references in README

2004-02-27 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
Here is a patch for this. ChangeLog 2004-02-27 Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * README, INSTALL: Changed [EMAIL PROTECTED]' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' proc/ChangeLog 2004-02-27 Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * host.c (rebuild_uname): Changed [EMAIL PROTECTED]' to

Re: wrong references in README

2004-02-27 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
Ignore this message, my MUA accidently sent it for some odd reason. The real message is the one that includes the diff for release/dist-README. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: wrong references in README

2004-02-27 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
Here is a patch for this. ChangeLog 2004-02-27 Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * README, INSTALL: Changed [EMAIL PROTECTED]' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' proc/ChangeLog 2004-02-27 Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * host.c (rebuild_uname): Changed [EMAIL PROTECTED]' to

Re: gnumach 1.3 + gcc 3.3

2004-02-27 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
I can add a newline to the generated files and check them in again. Does someone have a problem with that? I do. Since it is useles, wait until your patch gets commited, and then anyone who is commiting the generated files can wait with the commit of those file for 10 sec. or so. Cheers.

Re: gnumach 1.3 + gcc 3.3

2004-02-27 Thread Marco Gerards
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >I thought that the CVS at savannah.gnu.org was the main repository ... >This is the CVS command I issued: > >cvs -z3 -d:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/hurd co -r \ > gnumach-1-branch gnumach > > This is correct. But the configure.i

Re: /libexec/rc.local...

2004-02-27 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
I might add that the Debian package could rename its rc file to rc.local, and install that, instead of hacking the usual rc file to load daemons. But I don't use Debian, so I'll leave that for anyone who does. Cheers. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL

Re: /libexec/rc.local...

2004-02-27 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
--- daemons/rc.sh 8 Jun 2001 22:07:18 - 1.23 +++ daemons/rc.sh 27 Feb 2004 16:42:21 - @@ -115,4 +115,9 @@ echo . +echo -n running local commands... The person commiting this patch, please remove the -n before commiting. Sorry for the trouble. +if [

/libexec/rc.local...

2004-02-27 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
Hey, I made this hack so one can install the Hurd without getting screwed over by /libexec/rc getting overwritten. Now instead of tweaking /libexec/rc, users can tweak /libexec/rc.local, and still be safe from a overwritten /libexec/rc. Cheers. 2004-02-27 Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [linux 2.6 patch] ext2 support for hurd extensions via xattr interface

2004-02-27 Thread Danilo Segan
Hi Philip, Philip Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If the patched linux kernel is used with mkfs then it produces a hurd fs > that is free from the 1-2Gb limit? You don't need "patched linux kernel" to build larger ext2 filesystems with "-o hurd" than 2GB -- this was possible for a long ti

Re: warning while running [libc]/configure

2004-02-27 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
It prints warning message: configure: WARNING: --prefix= (empty) is requed for GNU/Hurd to work normaly. I wish to install libc to the root. So I try $ ../configure --prefix=/ Warning message printed again, --prefix="/" follow to same results. Why setting --prefix does not av

Re: SRC, but in what

2004-02-27 Thread Ollie Benton
Banned CD Government don't want me to sell it. See Now _ instable vetch carmen dubious gladiolus recurrent cottage cantabrigian menstruate shark antimony inland appointee morn berniece turbofan beman chimera bordeaux postposition obstacle possible peridotite project marrietta roberts gogh monom

Re: warning while running [libc]/configure

2004-02-27 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 12:58:10PM +0600, Dmitry V. Zhulanov wrote: > Hi! > > While running [libc]/configure script > $ mkdir build;cd build > $ ../configure > > It prints warning message: > configure: WARNING: --prefix= (empty) is requed for GNU/Hurd to work > normaly. > > I wish to install lib

Re: [linux 2.6 patch] ext2 support for hurd extensions via xattr interface

2004-02-27 Thread Philip Charles
Because of overload I need to spend my free time sleeping, so please excuse me if I am asking the obvious. If the patched linux kernel is used with mkfs then it produces a hurd fs that is free from the 1-2Gb limit? Phil. -- Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedin, New Zealand