> What about maintaining a 1.3 branch? It works really stable here so I
> use GNUMach 1.3.
There exists a gnumach-1-branch for such maintenance. Noone ever said 1.3
had to be the last release on it, that was just the last time anyone wanted
to bother. If someone would like to post a complete, t
We are handicapped without a good micro kernel.
GNU Mach 1.3 at least works. Let us maintain this branch until some
one some day comes with a better working micro kernel.
,[ Derek Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
|
| ,[ Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ]
| |
| | ,[ "Alfred M. Sz
Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > the pickiness of gcc 3.3.x about asm() breaks GNU Mach compilation. I
> > haven't attached a ChangeLog since 1.3 is essentially considered dead
> > by some, but I like it more then 2.x.
>
> What abo
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the pickiness of gcc 3.3.x about asm() breaks GNU Mach compilation. I
> haven't attached a ChangeLog since 1.3 is essentially considered dead
> by some, but I like it more then 2.x.
What about maintaining a 1.3 branch? It works really stable here
Hi,
the pickiness of gcc 3.3.x about asm() breaks GNU Mach compilation. I
haven't attached a ChangeLog since 1.3 is essentially considered dead
by some, but I like it more then 2.x.
You will still probobly need the patch that fixes the sed line
[gnumach]/Makefile so that it compiles with newer v
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>What about maintaining a 1.3 branch? It works really stable here
>so I use GNUMach 1.3.
>
> I would happily do that since I consider the GNU Mach 2.x crap.
>
> Oh, and might note that my patch is incomplete, I found a couple of
> weird err
Обогреватели с доставкой!
Подробнее на http://dteplo.5p.org.uk/
P.S. Наши обогреватели не занимают места!
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
What about maintaining a 1.3 branch? It works really stable here
so I use GNUMach 1.3.
I would happily do that since I consider the GNU Mach 2.x crap.
Oh, and might note that my patch is incomplete, I found a couple of
weird errors that I don't have the time to fix right now, will do that
