The PC value suggests some botch relocation or something. Compare the last
several instructions in your gdb disassembly there with what objdump -rd
shows you on ld.so, and on the rtld.os file that went into making it.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL P
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 11:58:33AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:43:28PM +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> > This is strictly an internal GNU struggle, and has no relevance at all on
> > anything except how GNU is organized and what it means to be a GNU
> > maintainer.
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> ld.so.1 breaks a bit if you compile it with gcc 3.3.1 on GNU/Hurd,
Please note that if you are using the Debian gcc packages, then it would
be really gcc-3.3 version 3.3.2-3. On Debian, gcc_3.3.1-2 is a
dependency package which does not contain anyth
> ld.so.1 breaks a bit if you compile it with gcc 3.3.1 on
> GNU/Hurd,
Please note that if you are using the Debian gcc packages, then it
would be really gcc-3.3 version 3.3.2-3. On Debian, gcc_3.3.1-2 is
a dependency package which does not contain anything by itself.
I don't use D
