Bug#196085: Problem in glibc-2.3.2/elf/do-lookup.h

2003-06-05 Thread Ognyan Kulev
This bug is reassigned to libc0.3. The problem seems to be that glibc-2.3.2/elf/do-lookup.h:do_lookup signals SEGV when SCOPE array is empty. I don't know the semantics of these data structures, but if it's allowed this array to be empty, then the attached patch will solve the problem. (I'm

Disallowed attachment type found in sent message "Re: Approved"

2003-06-05 Thread System Anti-Virus Administrator
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A Disallowed attachment type was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The Disallowed attachment type was reported to be: SCR files not allowed per Company security policy

Processed: Whoops - unforward please

2003-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > notforwarded 196085 Bug#196085: Bugs in store_typed_open and store_find_class Removed annotation that Bug had been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#196085: marked as forwarded (Bugs in store_typed_open andstore_find_class)

2003-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated 05 Jun 2003 08:10:47 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has caused the Debian Bug report #196085, regarding Bugs in store_typed_open and store_find_class to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NB: If you are a system ad

Bug#196085: Whoops - unforward please

2003-06-05 Thread Timshel Knoll
notforwarded 196085 thanks It would have helped if I had have read all of the mails before forwarding it to the parted list, sorry about that :-( Cheers, Timshel -- Timshel Knoll Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://www.debian.org/ SPI Contributing Member http://www.spi-inc.org/ GnuPG

Bug#196085: [Fwd: Re: Bug#196085: Device files are not acceptedunder the Hurd]

2003-06-05 Thread Ognyan Kulev
Ognyan Kulev wrote: I send a simple patch for the first bug mentioned. I forgot to change the copyright years. Sorry. Regards -- Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "\"Programmer\"" 7D9F 66E6 68B7 A62B 0FCF EB04 80BF 3A8C A252 9782 --- typed.c.~1.6.~ 2002-03-14 23:10:01.0 +0200 +++ t

Bug#196085: [Fwd: Re: Bug#196085: Device files are not acceptedunder the Hurd]

2003-06-05 Thread Ognyan Kulev
Ognyan Kulev wrote: It seems that the bug is in libstore, not in parted. When store_typed_open doesn't find ":" character, it calls store_open. Unfortunately, it does it incorrectly, and, as a result, store_open is not called as intended. There is second bug somewhere in store_find_class, called

Re: [Fwd: Re: Bug#196085: Device files are not accepted under theHurd]

2003-06-05 Thread Neal H. Walfield
> > Under the Hurd, when device file is passed as an argument to "parted", > > Segmentation fault occurs. More detailed report can be found in > > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2002-10/msg00036.html > > The reason is using store_typed_open instead of store_open. More > > information c

Processed: severity

2003-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 196085 normal Bug#196085: Bugs in store_typed_open and store_find_class Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bu

Processed: no patch

2003-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 196085 - patch Bug#196085: Bugs in store_typed_open and store_find_class Tags were: patch upstream Tags removed: patch > tags 196085 + sid Bug#196085: Bugs in store_typed_open and store_find_class Tags were: upstream Tags added: sid > regards Unk

Processed: real reassign from parted to hurd

2003-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 196085 hurd Bug#196085: Device files are not accepted under the Hurd Bug reassigned from package `parted' to `hurd'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admin

[Fwd: Re: Bug#196085: Device files are not accepted under the Hurd]

2003-06-05 Thread Ognyan Kulev
Original Message From: Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ognyan Kulev wrote: Under the Hurd, when device file is passed as an argument to "parted", Segmentation fault occurs. More detailed report can be found in http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2002-10/msg00036.html The

Processed: Bugs in store_typed_open and store_find_class

2003-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 196085 Bugs in store_typed_open and store_find_class Bug#196085: Device files are not accepted under the Hurd Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administr

Processed: Reassign from parted package to hurd package

2003-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 195318 hurd Bug#195318: parted: Parted will not build Bug reassigned from package `parted' to `hurd'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Processed: mistake

2003-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 195318 parted Bug#195318: parted: Parted will not build Bug reassigned from package `hurd' to `parted'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Deb

Bug#196085: Device files are not accepted under the Hurd

2003-06-05 Thread Ognyan Kulev
Package: parted Version: 1.6.5-1 Severity: important Tags: patch, upstream Under the Hurd, when device file is passed as an argument to "parted", Segmentation fault occurs. More detailed report can be found in http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2002-10/msg00036.html The reason is using stor