Re: Bug#184573: missing res_search in -lresolv

2003-03-27 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:54:08 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 03:50:00PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > >i.e. "res_search" is only available if the oldest version of glibc for > >that platform was 2.0.x, I believe. > > > >Whether this is standards conformi

Re: Bug#184573: missing res_search in -lresolv

2003-03-27 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
i.e. "res_search" is only available if the oldest version of glibc for that platform was 2.0.x, I believe. Whether this is standards conforming or not you'll have to take up with someone who knows POSIX better. res_search has nothing todo with POSIX.

Re: Bug#184573: missing res_search in -lresolv

2003-03-27 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 03:50:00PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: >i.e. "res_search" is only available if the oldest version of glibc for >that platform was 2.0.x, I believe. > >Whether this is standards conforming or not you'll have to take up with >someone who knows POSIX better.

Re: Bug#184573: missing res_search in -lresolv

2003-03-27 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 01:52:04PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 05:08:27PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > Ah, I found the problem. It's your miss. > > are you sure? now that i remember, Daniel Jacobowitz pointed out the same > before in this bug, but then he denied it: >

Re: Bug#184573: missing res_search in -lresolv

2003-03-27 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 05:08:27PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > Ah, I found the problem. It's your miss. are you sure? now that i remember, Daniel Jacobowitz pointed out the same before in this bug, but then he denied it: "Bug in the configure test. Include before attempting to use res_search

Re: Bug#184573: missing res_search in -lresolv

2003-03-27 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 05:08:27PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > Ah, I found the problem. It's your miss. > > [..] thanks for the help! > I don't think it's bug, so I would like to close this report, ok? no please. the test code was taken from an autoconf test, so if the code is wrong this bug

Re: Bug#184573: missing res_search in -lresolv

2003-03-27 Thread GOTO Masanori
Ah, I found the problem. It's your miss. At Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:51:05 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > res_search is not present in -lresolv for libc0.3. from an autoconf test: > > $ cat test.c > /* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error. */ > /* We use char because int might match

Re: Bug#184573: missing res_search in -lresolv

2003-03-27 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:51:05 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > Package: libc0.3 > Severity: normal Please provide the version information. > res_search is not present in -lresolv for libc0.3. from an autoconf test: > > $ cat test.c > /* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error. */